2014
DOI: 10.7748/ns.29.4.37.e8665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to empower patients, and involve the public

Abstract: Individual empowerment and Patient and Public Involvement are a key focus for contemporary NHS policy in a quasi-market health economy concerned to emphasise patient decision making and representation as a feature of a customer focused NHS.Such language suggests a rebalancing of power in the nurse-patient relationship. The reality is it masks the wider issues of power and control in a complex health service of professional agendas and leadership, government targets and a business culture.Nevertheless, and desp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while Anderson and Funnell (2010) agree that ‘there are certainly cultural differences in the expression of a patient’s sense of empowerment’, they alert us to the fact that culture does not hinder the ‘ability to assume responsibility and make informed decisions’ or be empowered. Authors in the UK (Piper, 2010, 2014), Italy (Russo et al, 2019) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (Bodolica and Spraggon, 2019) seem to agree to this point. Thus, further validation of the framework in different cultures and larger groups, including with respect to other NCDs, is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, while Anderson and Funnell (2010) agree that ‘there are certainly cultural differences in the expression of a patient’s sense of empowerment’, they alert us to the fact that culture does not hinder the ‘ability to assume responsibility and make informed decisions’ or be empowered. Authors in the UK (Piper, 2010, 2014), Italy (Russo et al, 2019) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (Bodolica and Spraggon, 2019) seem to agree to this point. Thus, further validation of the framework in different cultures and larger groups, including with respect to other NCDs, is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Other issues that must not be ignored include cross-cultural differences and how they might influence empowerment. Among them may be variations in strategies for engaging or empowering individuals with NCDs as well as the social-political environment and, consequently, its openness to advocacy and acceptance of individuals living with NCDs as relevant stakeholders and decision makers (Anderson and Funnell, 2010; Bodolica and Spraggon, 2019; Hawley and Morris, 2017; Piper, 2010; Roberts, 1999, 2014). As a result, in other cultures, not all steps and stages of the EL may be seen as desirable by individuals living with NCDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pursuit of a democratic approach to healthcare provision and research, which has driven the growth of involvement in research, has been discussed as empowering healthcare users and patient representatives to contribute to the research process and hold researchers accountable in publicly funded research. Methods of actively empowering patients and members of the public have previously been suggested [ 31 , 32 ], and research training for the public has been discussed as enabling members of the public to critique the research cycle more effectively and improve public confidence in articulating their sentiments during involvement [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%