2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2003.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
42
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, each scenario exercise is a mixture of different modes and practice is shaped by the image(s) of the future and the techniques applied. Combinations of techniques are possible and found in our case studies and in literature (see for instance Postma &Liebl, 2005 andSaritas &Aylen, 2010). However to strengthen the enablers for innovation, the link between practice and theory, represented via the modes of futures thinking should be acknowledged when designing and implementing future scenario exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In reality, each scenario exercise is a mixture of different modes and practice is shaped by the image(s) of the future and the techniques applied. Combinations of techniques are possible and found in our case studies and in literature (see for instance Postma &Liebl, 2005 andSaritas &Aylen, 2010). However to strengthen the enablers for innovation, the link between practice and theory, represented via the modes of futures thinking should be acknowledged when designing and implementing future scenario exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similar to the Storyline and Simulation (SAS) approach (Alcamo, 2001), the axes and logics then provide input into the selection and checking of numerical estimates of driving force change in the IDA model. The scenarios are checked and integrated by applying two important principles of scenario construction; plausibility of change (Nakicenovic et al, 2000) and internal consistency within the scenarios (Postma and Liebl, 2005). The scenarios can then be amended where necessary as in the SAS approach.…”
Section: Scenario Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method uses the partial differential equations which govern both the firm's expected profit and the values of regulatory interest. It therefore contrasts with scenario analysis (Postma and Liebl, 2005) by considering all possible future scenarios, and is exact in that it does not require simulations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%