How to Select Replacement Grafts for Various Periodontal and Implant Indications

Hsu, Yung‐Ting; Wang, Hom‐Lay

doi:10.1902/cap.2012.120031

Cited by 18 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 95 publications

(107 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, to date, autologous bone grafts and allografts are recommended because of the favorable results reported in the literature [1].…”

Section: Periodontal Defectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However experimental designs are very heterogeneous and to date, limited evidence is available to make a conclusion to suggest any specific type of bone replacement materials to use as a gold standard to treat peri-implant defects. Additional research is expected to address the regenerative procedures in peri-implant lesions [1].…”

Section: Peri-implant Defectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These combinations of BRG are advantageous because of the capacity of space maintenance with low-turnover rate bone grafts (cortical allografts and deproteinized bovine bone mineral) and the property of osteogenesis and/or osteoinduction and/or osteoconduction of autografts/cancellous allografts [1].…”

Section: Ridge Augmentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To regain lost bone and/or periodontal tissue, bone replacement grafts (BRG) played an important role in regenerative procedures for many years. Their use became an integral part of periodontal and implant therapy (infra-bony defects, furcation defects, ridge augmentation, socket preservation, peri-implant defects, and sinus augmentation) [1]. These rege can be categorized on the basis of their biological origin as autologous bone graft when obtained from the same individual receiving the graft; homologous bone graft, or allograft, when harvested from an individual other than the one receiving the graft; animal-derived heterologous bone graft, or xenograft, when deriving from a species other than human; and alloplastic graft, made of bone substitute of synthetic origin [2].…”

Section: Abdel Rahman Kassir* | Carole Chakar** Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives of Bone Replacement Grafts

Kassir¹,

Chakar²

2018

IAJD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone and periodontal regenerative procedures represent a fundamental component of periodontal practice. While autologous bone graft has always been considered the ideal material for the repair and/or reconstruction of craniofacial defects, its limited availability and harvesting-associated complications and discomfort lead to a substantial interest in bone replacement grafts (BRG) throughout the years. With increasing technological advances and understanding, the spectrum of BRG has broadened and taking into consideration that not all BRM perform in the same way, the appropriate clinical choice needs to be performed among the large varieties of available biomaterials. Because an understanding of the properties of each BRG enables individualized clinical selection, the objective of this article is to provide a review on the different types of BRG intended for reconstructive therapy and provide an overview on the current innovations and future perspectives in this field.

show abstract

“…Therefore, to date, autologous bone grafts and allografts are recommended because of the favorable results reported in the literature [1].…”

Section: Periodontal Defectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Peri-implant Defectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ridge Augmentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Abdel Rahman Kassir* | Carole Chakar** Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives of Bone Replacement Grafts

Kassir¹,

Chakar²

2018

IAJD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Alveolar bone is an essential structure that plays a key role in tooth support, dental implant osseointegration, and denture stability (Zaky and Cancedda, 2009;Hsu and Wang, 2013). After tooth extraction, bone is resorbed in a progressive and irreversible manner, resulting in dimensional changes in the edentulous area (Bodic et al, 2005).…”

Section: Perspectives Of Nanotechnology In Oral Regenerative Medicinementioning

confidence: 99%

Carbon Nanotubes

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the main goals of bone tissue engineering is to identify and develop new biomaterials and scaffolds for structural support and controlled cell growth, which allow for formation or replacement of bone tissue. Recently, carbon nanotubes (CNT) have emerged as a potential candidate for bone tissue engineering. CNT present remarkable mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties with easy functionalization capability and biocompatibility. In oral regenerative medicine, bone reconstruction is an essential requirement for functional rehabilitation of the stomatognathic system. Autologous bone still represents the gold standard graft material for bone reconstruction. However, the small amounts of bone available in donor regions, together with the high costs of surgeries, are critical aspects that hinder the selection of this procedure. Thus, CNT alone or combined with biopolymers have promise to be used as novel potential biomaterials for the restoration of bone defects. Indeed, recent evidence demonstrates CNT to be a feasible material that can increase the formation of bone in tooth sockets of rats. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent developments in bone repair/regeneration with CNT or CNT-based composites. We further provide an overview of bone tissue engineering and current applications of biomaterials, especially of CNT, to enhance bone regeneration.

show abstract