2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10616-012-9441-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human amniotic fluid-derived c-kit+ and c-kit− stem cells: growth characteristics and some differentiation potential capacities comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation is that CD117 + cells represent a very small percentage of the total huAFSC population and if not selected at the very early stages of cell culturing, they can be obscured to flow cytometric detection by the more abundant CD117 − cell population, which becomes more and more predominant passage after passage in culture. Noteworthy, regardless of being CD117 − , in our hands and in agreement with previous findings [5254], huAFSC showed a good differentiation potential, even after a number of passages in culture. They were able to undergo, when grown in appropriate medium, osteogenic or adipogenic commitment, as documented by the upregulation of early molecular markers and the occurrence of phenotypic changes (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A possible explanation is that CD117 + cells represent a very small percentage of the total huAFSC population and if not selected at the very early stages of cell culturing, they can be obscured to flow cytometric detection by the more abundant CD117 − cell population, which becomes more and more predominant passage after passage in culture. Noteworthy, regardless of being CD117 − , in our hands and in agreement with previous findings [5254], huAFSC showed a good differentiation potential, even after a number of passages in culture. They were able to undergo, when grown in appropriate medium, osteogenic or adipogenic commitment, as documented by the upregulation of early molecular markers and the occurrence of phenotypic changes (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present work, stem cell factor receptor c‐kit was expressed by only 1% of the af‐MSCs. Although most previous studies were performed with c‐kit‐positive‐sorted af‐MSCs, recent work showed that c‐kit‐positive and c‐kit‐negative af‐MSCs mostly share the same differentiation potential, except that for myocardial differentiation [25]. Consequently, we selected af‐MSCs by direct adhesion because this method is suitable for clinical application and avoids cell sorting, which is expensive and time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a similar method, we have subjected the rat full-term AF cells to immuno-selection against c-kit, anticipating the isolation of stem cells with a wider differentiation spectrum. C-kit, a cell surface receptor specific for stem cell factor (SCF), has been used to serve as a valuable marker to identify undifferentiated ESCs that have higher potential to expand and differentiate (Bai et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2009;Deberry et al, 1997). The c-kit sorting procedure has been shown to be able to enrich pluripotent stem cells using AFSC and ESC cultures (Bollini et al, 2011;Gekas et al, 2010).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%