Human Development Index (HDI)

Aydoğan, Sefer

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_557-1

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As evidence, it shows that the economy (0.2428) and society (0.2059) are the two fields with the largest weight in the RDI evaluation system, which means solving the unbalanced development of the economy and society will be a wise move in improving the quality of the world. This result also verifies the rationality of the Human Development Index (HDI) proposed by the United Nations [49], which evaluates life quality using three indicators: average life expectancy at birth, adult education in the social field, and GDP per capita at purchasing power parity in the economic field [50].…”

Section: Compatibility Analysissupporting

confidence: 73%

A New Measurement of Global Equity in a Sustainability Perspective: Examining Differences from Space and Time Dimensions

Cai

Zhang

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the increasing development gap, how to measure global equity in the perspective of sustainability has become an essential issue nowadays. To examine the intra-generational equity from the space dimension and the inter-generational equity from the time dimension, a new measurement of global equity in a sustainability is proposed in this paper. Firstly, a comprehensive assessment index of regional development and an index of regional equity are constructed based on panel data using an entropy weight method (EVW) and a coefficient of variation method (CVM). Secondly, the intra-generational equity within different continents and echelons and the inter-generational equity in seven fields over the last 30 years are analyzed. Lastly, the global equity index for the next 10 years is predicted based on a panel data autoregressive model. The results of the study will be a reference for global equity strategies.

show abstract

Section: Compatibility Analysissupporting

confidence: 73%

A New Measurement of Global Equity in a Sustainability Perspective: Examining Differences from Space and Time Dimensions

Cai

Zhang

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the 2013 value, participating countries are listed in the following order: LU 261 %, NL 135 %, AT 131 %, DK 128 %, SE 125 %, DE 124 %, BE 120 % and FR 108 %, ranking above the mean, IT 98 %, ES 89 %, CZ 84 %, SI 82 % and EE 75 %, ranking under the mean value, Eurostat (2019). If we take more complex Human Development Index (HDI) Programme (2019) reflecting life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, analysed countries are in an excellent position in the world. The index in 2012 is Denmark (HDI 0.931, world rank 3), Germany (0.928, 5), the Netherlands (0.923, 7), Sweden (0.912, 12), Belgium (0.908, 17), Austria (0.897, 20), Luxemburg (0.892, 23), France (0.889, 24), Slovenia (0.885, 25), Italy (0.876, 26), Spain (0.875, 27), the Czech Republic (0.874, 28), Estonia (0.862, 29).…”

Section: Composite Indicators and Share Survey 21 Indices Quantifying...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Quality of Life of the European Population: SHARE Data-based Analysis

Malá¹

2023

AJS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quality of life, well-being and deprivation are significant factors affecting the ageing European population. The fifth (2013) wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) covers the two indices of (material and social) deprivation along with various life quality and satisfaction indicators measuring (subjective and objective) well-being. Using the SHARE data, the present paper examines the 50+ population in 13 EU member states and Switzerland, emphasizing the relationships between distinctive characteristics. The gender gap is quantified for both the whole sample and particular age groups. Statistical comparisons between old and new EU countries are limited since only three of the latter (Estonia, Slovenia and the Czech Republic) took part in the 2013 SHARE survey.

show abstract

“…In Figure 3A, we show the z-scores of country policy activity levels of all 187 countries. In addition, we collect the HDI 30 scores for 170 countries in 2017 from the "Our World in Data" online data set, 31 which measures the average achievement in key dimensions of human development:…”

Section: Policy Activity Levels At the Country Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global analysis of the COVID‐19 policy activity levels and evolution patterns: A cross‐sectional study

Chen

Dong

Shi

et al. 2023

Health Science Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of government policies have been implemented worldwide in response to the global spread of COVID-19. This paper aims at developing a data-driven analysis to answer the three research questions: (a) Compared to the pandemic development, are the global government COVID-19 policies sufficiently active? (b) What are the differences and characteristics in the policy activity levels at the country level? (c) What types of COVID-19 policy patterns are forming? Methods: Using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker data set, we present a global analysis of the COVID-19 policy activity levels and evolution patterns from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2022, based on the differential expression-sliding window analysis (DE-SWAN) algorithm and the clustering ensemble algorithm. Results: Within the period under study, the results indicate that (a) the global government policy responses to COVID-19 are very active, and the policy activity levels are significantly higher than those of global pandemic developments; (b) a high activity of policy is positively correlated to pandemic prevention at the country level; and (c) a high human development index (HDI) score is negatively correlated to the country policy activity level. Furthermore, we propose to categorize the global policy evolution patterns into three categories: (i) Mainstream (152 countries); (ii) China; and (iii) Others (34 countries). Conclusion: This work is one of the few studies that quantitatively explores the evolutionary characteristics of global government policies on COVID-19, and our results provide some new perspectives on global policy activity levels and evolution patterns.

show abstract

Human Development Index (HDI)

Cited by 8 publications

References 2 publications

A New Measurement of Global Equity in a Sustainability Perspective: Examining Differences from Space and Time Dimensions

A New Measurement of Global Equity in a Sustainability Perspective: Examining Differences from Space and Time Dimensions

The Quality of Life of the European Population: SHARE Data-based Analysis

Global analysis of the COVID‐19 policy activity levels and evolution patterns: A cross‐sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About