Human error analysis using sherpa and heart method in Batik Cap production process

Pratiwi, Indah; Masita, Maya; Munawir, Hafidh; Fitriadi, Ratnanto

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/674/1/012051

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Penelitian yang dilakukan Siregar, Erliana, & Syarifuddin (2019) mengidentifikasi human error sebesar 35, 34% pada pekerjaan pembuatan tas aceh. Beberapa faktor yang menyebabkan tingginya human error antara lain peralatan yang kurang mendukung (Pratiwi, et, al., 2019), tingkat kemampuan operator (Sembiring, Tambunan, & Febriani, 2019), maupun peralatan safety yang kurang memadai (Rahayu, Kholik, & Restuputri, 2015). Identifikasi penyebab human error sebagai dasar rekomendasi perbaikan untuk menurunkan tingkat human error seperti mengevaluasi proses kerja yang ada (Ariefiani et al, 2019), redesign peralatan sampai (Astuti & Saptadi, 2019) peningkatan skill pekerja.…”

unclassified

Analisis Human Error pada Proses Produksi Keramik dengan Menggunakan Metode HEART dan SHERPA

Utama¹,

Tambunan²,

Fathimahhayati³

2020

INTECH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unit Pelaksana Teknis Dinas Pusat Pengembangan Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil Menengah Kota Samarinda melakukan proses produksi untuk membantu masyarakat memenuhi kebutuhan produk tanpa harus memesan keluar pulau. UPTD P2KUKM mempunyai empat workshop, salah satunya workshop keramik, Workshop keramik memproduksi dua jenis yaitu earthenware dan stoneware. Proses produksi keramik dilakukan dengan mengandalkan tenaga manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi human error yang terjadi pada proses produksi dan memberikan rekomendasi perbaikan untuk meminimalkan human error yang terjadi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode SHERPA dan HEART dalam menganalisis human error yang terjadi. Metode kualitatif menggunakan SHERPA untuk mengidentifikasi human error. Metode kuantitatif dengan metode HEART untuk mengetahui nilai probabilitas terjadinya human error. Berdasarkan data yang diperoleh dengan menggunakan HTA, pada proses produksi keramik mempunyai 6 tahapan yang terbagi dalam 18 sub-pekerjaan. Analisis secara kualitatif menggunakan metode SHERPA memperoleh 18 kemungkinan error yang dapat dilakukan oleh pekerja. Berdasarkan analisis secara kuantitatif didapatkan nilai Human Error Probability (HEP) tertinggi yaitu pada sub-pekerjaan membersihkan tanah dari kotoran dengan nilai HEP sebesar 0.99. Rekomendasi perbaikan untuk mengurangi terjadinya kesalahan manusia (human error) yaitu briefing sebelum melakukan pekerjaan, membuat display, membuat form checklist, melakukan pengawasan dan training. Meminimalkan human error pada suatu proses produksi secara tidak langsung mampu meningkatkan tingkat produktivitas pekerja.

show abstract

unclassified

Analisis Human Error pada Proses Produksi Keramik dengan Menggunakan Metode HEART dan SHERPA

Utama¹,

Tambunan²,

Fathimahhayati³

2020

INTECH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The two last stages include Critical Analysis and proposed improvement. In addition, HEART implementation follows [10], [18]: the first is to classify tasks based on Generic Task Types (GTTs), and the second is to determine the unreliability value of the job. In addition, the third is to assess the value of Error Producing Condition (EPC), and the fourth is to determine the Assessed Proportion of Effect (APOE).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sixth calculates the Human Error Probability (HEP) with the procedure. The seventh calculates the Total Human Reliability formula [18]. The determination of the probability value is carried out to determine the value of the Assessed Proportion of Effect (APOE) of the EPC with a formula as follows [19]: APOE = ((total HEART effect -1) x Probability Rating) + 1…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of the HEART and SHERPA Approach to Evaluating Human Errors in the Refinery Salt Production

Rammadaniya

Mahbubah²

2022

j.sist.teknik.industri.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human error can be prevented by measuring human reliability through the Human Reliability Assessment approach. PT A is a national scale salt producer that produces salt. The quality division identifies human error problems made by operators in the salt refining process. This study aims to identify, calculate probability values, and provide recommendations for improvement to reduce human error in salt refining production operators. HEART and SHERPA are research approaches used because they are considered the most suitable for this study. The results showed that the most visible human error for the error mode category was C2, incomplete checking, and 42 error modes because the operator infrequently did a complete check. The process with the highest Human Error Probability value is the drying process 1, with a value of 7.49. In contrast, the process with the most minor Human Error Probability value score of 0.085 is the bagging process 2. Human error prevention efforts are carried out for each process based on the highest score on the Human Error Probability Index, including Personal Protective Equipment, Standard Operating Procedures, and training to improve operator skills.

show abstract

“…Metode SHERPA dapat digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi error yang disebabkan oleh manusia berdasarkan kebiasaan dan keahliannya. Metode ini juga secara konsisten dan rinci dalam mengidentifikasi mengenai faktor error yang disebabkan oleh manusia [13]. Tujuan metode SHERPA yaitu untuk menentukan tingkat probabilitas error dengan merekomendasikan strategi perbaikan terhadap kondisi probabilitas error [4].…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Human Error Analysis to Minimize Work Accidents Using the HEART and SHERPA Methods at PT. Wonojati Wijoyo

Cahyani¹,

Safirin²,

Donoriyanto³

et al. 2022

prozima

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PT Wonojati Wijoyo is a company that produces furniture for export. In carrying out the production process, work accidents often occur. One of the causes is the factor of human negligence. Work accidents that have occurred include torn wounds due to being hit by a machine, legs hit by wood to make them swollen, fingers hit by machines to open wounds, fingers caught in blocks to open wounds. This study aims to determine the value of Human Error Probability (HEP) and recommend improvement strategies for activities that have the potential to cause human errors to minimize work accidents. The method used in the analysis of human error is the HEART method and the SHERPA method. The results showed that there are critical activities that have the potential for human error to occur, namely in 14 subtasks of 9 processes. The highest probability of human error is in the subtask of cutting wood plates using a circle machine with a HEP value of 0.88827 including the high category. While the lowest probability of human error is in the subtask of setting a copy machine with reference wood with a HEP value of 0.00372 including the medium category. One of the recommendations for improvement strategies to minimize work accidents is that the company needs to conduct training on K3 on a scheduled basis with an explanation of the risks that occur if you do not use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

show abstract

Human error analysis using sherpa and heart method in Batik Cap production process

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Analisis Human Error pada Proses Produksi Keramik dengan Menggunakan Metode HEART dan SHERPA

Analisis Human Error pada Proses Produksi Keramik dengan Menggunakan Metode HEART dan SHERPA

Integration of the HEART and SHERPA Approach to Evaluating Human Errors in the Refinery Salt Production

Human Error Analysis to Minimize Work Accidents Using the HEART and SHERPA Methods at PT. Wonojati Wijoyo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About