Human Nature and Morality in the Anti‐corruption Discourse of Transparency International

Abstract

SUMMARY Against the background of failing anti‐corruption programmes, this article examines the discourse of the anti‐corruption international non‐governmental organisation Transparency International (TI), thereby focussing on the organisation's use of the concepts of integrity and ethics. Their meaning and significance is explored by looking at policy measures advocated by TI and particularly at the conception of human nature underlying the organisation's discourse. On the basis of TI documents and interviews with TI staff, the article argues that there is dominance within TI discourse of a mechanistic conception of human nature as rational and self‐interested. This leads to an over‐emphasis on institutional engineering and the strengthening of oversight and control (to set ‘disincentives’ for corruption), while neglecting the social–moral components of human behaviour as well as the political processes of their generation. This conception of human behaviour makes concepts such as ‘ethics’ mean not much more than ‘rules’, ‘integrity’ mean no more than ‘rule‐conforming behaviour’ and ‘prevention’ mean no more than ‘control’. While discussing some of the difficulties involved in addressing morals, the article argues that without reconsidering its conception of human nature, it will be difficult for TI to re‐orient and improve its approach. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Transparency Initiative for Enhancing QoL: Behavioural components leading to corruption

“…It is a broad ranging concept affected in a complex way by the person's physical health, psychological state, level of independence, social relationships, personal beliefs and their relationship to salient features of their environment. Corruption should be treated both the technical (insufficient legislation) and behavioural factors of the institutions (Gebel, 2012). This is due to the fact that corruption occurs as a form of behaviour violating the official ethics of public services, a stem of social norms that emphasize gift-giving and loyalty to family or clan, rather than the rule of laws (Park and Blenkinsopp, 2011;Montinola & Jackman, 2002).…”

“…Transparency is directly linked to integrity; a person with integrity opens themselves up for the scrutiny of others and is transparent with regards to their actions (Gebel, 2012). Most importantly, transparency is an essential precondition for containing corruption, as it renders abuse of power and increases the likelihood of detection.…”

“…An 'inclination' for corruption is conceived to be intrinsic to human nature, and yet needs permissiveness, opportunities and incentives (Rabl and Kuhlmann, 2008;Gebel, 2012). A great deal of effort has been done to fight corruption in order to turn the industry towards prosperity with greater equity and give life to sustainable development.…”

The Mediating Role of Ethics in the Relationship Between Attitudes and Corruption

“…And this neglect has affected the several failed attempts to resolve the issue. Adding insult to injury is the arrogance of the western world and the direction to adopt western rules and standards in the fight against corruption is globally binding (see (Gebel, 2012). Finally, we can say that corruption is the slope at which an individual's moral and falling practices bring harm to others taking personal interests into consideration.…”

The Effect of Religious Beliefs, Participation and Values on Corruption: Survey Evidence from Iraq

“…The most famous definition of corruption is the use of public power for private gain [2]. Several attempts to fight corruption has always let to disappointing results, and this has prompted the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) to highlight on the social changes and behavior in this issue [3].…”