2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papillomavirus subtypes in oral lesions compared to healthy oral mucosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data corroborate those of Cianfriglia et al [6] and Kristoffersen et al [24], findings in a similar manner showing that there was no statistical difference between the groups studied, however, the absolute numbers of the rate of infection by HPV in the groups with leukoplakia were higher than those found in the control group. The authors of the present study recommend follow-up of the HPV-positive lesions, because the overall prevalence of HPV in patients with oral leukoplakia was higher in comparison with those with normal oral mucosa, therefore one must not exclude the possibility that HPV may play an important role in the development of oral leukoplakia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data corroborate those of Cianfriglia et al [6] and Kristoffersen et al [24], findings in a similar manner showing that there was no statistical difference between the groups studied, however, the absolute numbers of the rate of infection by HPV in the groups with leukoplakia were higher than those found in the control group. The authors of the present study recommend follow-up of the HPV-positive lesions, because the overall prevalence of HPV in patients with oral leukoplakia was higher in comparison with those with normal oral mucosa, therefore one must not exclude the possibility that HPV may play an important role in the development of oral leukoplakia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, no statistical difference was found between the presence of HPV and the variables (sex, age, anatomic location of the lesion, tobacco and alcohol consumption, presence/ absence of dysplasia), data similar to those of other studies, in which there was no statistical difference for these variables and the presence of HPV in oral leukoplakias [1,19,24,29]. In the group of patients with oral leukoplakia the authors believed that age did not interfere in the status of HPV, differently from the group of patients with SCC of the head and neck, in whom a higher incidence of infection by HPV was reported in young patients, mainly due to sexual habits [19,30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Some of the relatively larger studies from India [30], Scandinavia [60], and China [96] demonstrate significantly greater oral HPV carrier rates as compared to the other studies, suggesting that real geographic differences may be present. The WP of intraoral HPV detection is significantly lower than the rate of HPV detection in oral carcinomas (6.9 vs. 20.2 %, respectively, p = 0.0002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Baixas prevalências foram encontradas por Ammatuna et al 7 (3,3%) e Migaldi et al 8 na Itália (1,2%). Altas prevalências foram observadas por Zhang et al 9 na China (55%) e Kristoffersen et al 10 na Noruega (56%).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Kristoffersen et al 10 verificaram presença de HPV 6, 11 e 16. HPV 6 e 11 foram encontrados em duas amostras concomitantemente; HPV 6, em 11 amostras; HPV 11, em 7 amostras; e HPV 16, em uma.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified