2001
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-00703003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Security: A Shotgun Approach to Alleviating Human Misery?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26 This author's ongoing research includes observations from a larger number of cases, though this work is in process and not currently ready for publication.27 The human security debate is ongoing, and there are important conceptual problems that are yet to be resolved and cannot be addressed in this paper. See for example,Newman (2001),Khong (2001),Suhrke (1999), and other authors referenced in this article.at HOWARD UNIV UNDERGRAD LIBRARY on February 20, 2015 sdi.sagepub.com Downloaded from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 This author's ongoing research includes observations from a larger number of cases, though this work is in process and not currently ready for publication.27 The human security debate is ongoing, and there are important conceptual problems that are yet to be resolved and cannot be addressed in this paper. See for example,Newman (2001),Khong (2001),Suhrke (1999), and other authors referenced in this article.at HOWARD UNIV UNDERGRAD LIBRARY on February 20, 2015 sdi.sagepub.com Downloaded from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este resquício é bem configurado no aspecto em que, na visão da maioria dos policiais no Brasil, entende-se como marginal ou meliante aquele indivíduo pobre e que reside numa favela. Segundo Khong (2001), o conceito de segurança pública moderna traz para a agenda do estado a implementação dos direitos humanos e os problemas de desenvolvimento como pontos prioritários para a segurança.…”
Section: Segurança Pública No Brasilunclassified
“…Even if acknowledged as theoretically important, the idea is also still regarded as difficult to measure with the rigour and precision necessary for empirical research, for monitoring risks and for guiding strategic policy priorities. Critics suggest that the abstract concept of ‘human security’ is so conceptually ambiguous, normatively laden and all‐encompassing that it is difficult to measure with any validity, reducing its practical utility for scholars and policy makers (Khong 2001). Insufficient efforts have been made to operationalize the term (Glasius 2008).…”
Section: The Concept Of ‘Human Security’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents contend that this reconceptualization dissolves conventional disciplinary boundaries and existing paradigms so that the links between multiple risks and threats are better understood in an increasingly complex and globalized world (Tadjbakhsh & Chenoy 2007, Chapter 3; Thomas & Tow 2002; Burger 2004). In response, traditionalists argue that ‘human security’ is a muddled, value‐laden and confusing catch‐all notion, where a mélange of diverse challenges are ‘securitized’, without providing any additional analytical leverage for scholars or practical utility for policy analysts (Paris 2001; Khong 2001; Buzan 2004). The conventional conception of ‘security’, traditionalists suggest, emphasizing the role of the state in defending national interests against external threats, provides a sharper focus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%