2015
DOI: 10.7232/iems.2015.14.1.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Flow Shop with Parallel Machines at the First Stage and Dedicated Machines at the Second Stage

Abstract: In this paper, a two-stage hybrid flow shop problem is considered. Specifically, there exist identical parallel machines at stage 1 and two dedicated machines at stage 2, and the objective of the problem is to minimize makespan. After being processed by any machine at stage 1, a job must be processed by a specific machine at stage 2 depending on the job type, and one type of jobs can have different processing times on each machine. First, we introduce the problem and establish complexity of several variations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( [27], [30]) and Yang. [4]. For the other parameters, the datasets depend on the family instances, as presented below.…”
Section: Parameters Common To Both Families Of Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( [27], [30]) and Yang. [4]. For the other parameters, the datasets depend on the family instances, as presented below.…”
Section: Parameters Common To Both Families Of Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the α|β|γ notation of Graham et al [3], this problem can be noted as HF2(PD2,Pm)|ST g,sd ,lag+ i |Nbr_IT+, where ST g,sd designates the constraint sequence-dependent group setup, lag+ i designates the maximum machine time lag for j i , and Nbr_IT+ is a notation introduced by us to designate the number of IT grater than perishability time limit (θ). In the previous notation; proposed by Yang et al [4], the dedicated machines appear in the term as PD2, while the identical parallel machines at S2 are represented by Pm. This problem could also be noted HF2 (R2,Pm)|Mj,ST g,sd , lag+ i |Nbr_IT+; following Ribas et al [5] notations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%