Volume 5: Ocean Space Utilization; Ocean Renewable Energy 2011
DOI: 10.1115/omae2011-49377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Design and Analysis of Horizontal Axis Marine Current Turbines With Lifting Line and Panel Methods

Abstract: This paper presents the computational models used by the authors at MARETEC/IST for hydrodynamic design and analysis of horizontal axis marine current turbines. The models combine a lifting line method for the optimization of the turbine blade geometry and an Integral Boundary Element Method (IBEM) for the hydrodynamic analysis. The classical lifting line optimization is used to determine the optimum blade circulation distribution for maximum power extraction. Blade geometry is determined with simplified cavit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the agreement of the two numerical models with experimental data is comparable with some exceptions. Results by the present BIEM-VFC model better reproduce measured turbine power in case Φ = 20 • and thrust in case Φ = 25 • , while results from [7] better predict thrust in case Φ = 27 • . In these cases, differences occur throughout the TSR range and hence they can be explained as a combined effect of different viscosity correction and trailing wake models in the two formulations.…”
Section: Variable Pitch Turbine Studymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the agreement of the two numerical models with experimental data is comparable with some exceptions. Results by the present BIEM-VFC model better reproduce measured turbine power in case Φ = 20 • and thrust in case Φ = 25 • , while results from [7] better predict thrust in case Φ = 27 • . In these cases, differences occur throughout the TSR range and hence they can be explained as a combined effect of different viscosity correction and trailing wake models in the two formulations.…”
Section: Variable Pitch Turbine Studymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In order to complete the present validation study, it is also interesting to compare results by the proposed BIEM-VFC approach with data from the literature obtained using different computational models. Two cases are considered here: Bahaj et al [25] Comparisons between the present BIEM-VFC model and the BIEM with viscous flow correction proposed in [7] are presented in Figure 30. In general, the agreement of the two numerical models with experimental data is comparable with some exceptions.…”
Section: Variable Pitch Turbine Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major difficulty is that turbine blades frequently operate at high angle of attack and viscosity induced separation and stall significantly affect generated thrust and power. Baltazar & Falcão de Campos [6], [7] address the problem by comparing different models to correct inviscid-flow predictions by BIEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BUCKLAND et al [] extended this approach to by including a varying azimuth angle. the BALTAZAR et al [15] presented a model for predicting the cavitation number for a wide range of operating points based on the pressure distribution of the blade. This model took into account various rotor rotational speeds, but the effect of the near-tip flow on the pressure distribution has not been addressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%