2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-016-1752-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic focusing and interdistance control of particle-laden flow for microflow cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the particle Reynolds number is really in the order of less than unity, the inertial lift force of suspended particle from channel wall is negligible [29, 30]. Convection happens much faster than diffusion owing to the high Péclet number so that mixing of feed and side streams is quite slow [31]. For the interface boundary W int between two adjacent immiscible streams, Q F j and Q S j in the forefront of the branch point j can be obtained by integrating velocity profile of rectangular‐slit geometry, QjF=0H0WnormalintvzFfalse(xfalse)dxdy, QjS=0HWnormalintWvzSfalse(xfalse)dxdy.Then, we define the inlet flow ratio χ j as the flow ratio of Q F j to Q S j , χjQ0.16emjFQ0.16emjFQ0.16emjSQ0.16emjS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the particle Reynolds number is really in the order of less than unity, the inertial lift force of suspended particle from channel wall is negligible [29, 30]. Convection happens much faster than diffusion owing to the high Péclet number so that mixing of feed and side streams is quite slow [31]. For the interface boundary W int between two adjacent immiscible streams, Q F j and Q S j in the forefront of the branch point j can be obtained by integrating velocity profile of rectangular‐slit geometry, QjF=0H0WnormalintvzFfalse(xfalse)dxdy, QjS=0HWnormalintWvzSfalse(xfalse)dxdy.Then, we define the inlet flow ratio χ j as the flow ratio of Q F j to Q S j , χjQ0.16emjFQ0.16emjFQ0.16emjSQ0.16emjS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b). 73,77,78 Sheath flow here is a non-sample fluid, in most instances a buffer solution, the purpose of which is to modify and geometrically confine the flow field without using more of the often-precious sample. In FACS, 3D confinement is often achieved by concentrically injecting the fluid to be focused from a round nozzle into the sheath flow, which is conceptually simpler, but not easily compatible with planar microfabrication technologies.…”
Section: Stokes Flow-based Confinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a and b, theoretical models are also available to predict the inter-particle spacing for a sample being focused. 73 Non-Newtonian fluids do not follow the simplified Navier-Stokes equations presented above. For a discussion on non-Newtonian effects, see section 2.3.…”
Section: Stokes Flow-based Confinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives exceptionally improved estimates of cell populations and avoids adhesion with channel walls. The empirical model, which involves more complex flow physics than the 2D counterpart, has been formulated [80,81]. The 3D flow focusing is an area of active research and has been successfully realized by many research groups [82][83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Flow Focusingmentioning
confidence: 99%