2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen absorption into alpha titanium in acidic solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(35 reference statements)
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we obtained the following binding energies of hydrogen: 108 kJ/mol for electrolytic saturation and 102 kJ/mol for gas phase saturation. These data agree with the XRD results for the titanium alloy results [12,19] on determining the binding energy of hydrogen in a titanium alloy after electrolytic satura tion (108 and 106 kJ/mol) and gas phase saturation (100 kJ/mol). This binding energy range for hydrogen in titanium corresponds to hydride, which agrees with our XRD data.…”
Section: Thermally Stimulated Hydrogen Desorptionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As a result, we obtained the following binding energies of hydrogen: 108 kJ/mol for electrolytic saturation and 102 kJ/mol for gas phase saturation. These data agree with the XRD results for the titanium alloy results [12,19] on determining the binding energy of hydrogen in a titanium alloy after electrolytic satura tion (108 and 106 kJ/mol) and gas phase saturation (100 kJ/mol). This binding energy range for hydrogen in titanium corresponds to hydride, which agrees with our XRD data.…”
Section: Thermally Stimulated Hydrogen Desorptionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since the conditions for reduction of D + to D ads exist over this entire potential range, this slowdown in D uptake needs an explanation. The critical solubility of H in Ti for hydride formation at room-temperature ranges from 0.002 to 0.004 in atomic ratio H:Ti for bulk metal, [40][41][42] and from 0.06 to 0.07 for evaporated Ti films. 43,44 The marked difference between bulk and thin-film is undoubtedly due to morphology: bulk metal grains are tightly packed whereas evaporated thin-films contain substantial voids and cracks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protective surface oxide layer generally present on Ti exposed to air or aqueous systems can hinder hydrogen absorption into the metal [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. This retardation could be due to the lower diffusion coefficient for hydrogen in the oxide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen penetration into the oxide depends on a number of parameters, including the oxide's chemical composition and structure [20,29,34,35], the presence of Ti n+ interstitials and/or oxygen vacancies [36], the types of impurities and their concentration, the adsorption characteristics of the oxide surface [37], the solubility of hydrogen in the oxide, and environmental parameters, such as electrochemical potential [38] and temperature. Given these complexities and the absence of experimental data for aqueous solutions, it is difficult to predict how fast hydrogen will be transported through the oxide and what fraction of the hydrogen atoms generated on the oxide surface will reach the Ti substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%