Radiation‐induced defects are a common tool in the manufacturing of modern power semiconductor devices. Hydrogen‐related doping is a feasible method to introduce deep doping profiles with a low thermal budget. The hydrogen‐related donors (HDs) require radiation damage and hydrogen, which can be induced by different methods, e.g., proton implantation, helium and proton co‐implantation, or an implantation followed by a hydrogen‐plasma step. The choice of these methods significantly affects the introduction efficiency of the donors and the necessary post‐implantation thermal budget. By controlling the hydrogen‐to‐damage ratio, the manufacturing process of the HD profiles may be moved on a trade‐off between the activation efficiency and the necessary thermal budget. A low hydrogen‐to‐damage ratio leads to an increased activation of the HDs, whereas a high hydrogen‐to‐damage ratio reduces the necessary diffusion time of the hydrogen during the post‐implantation anneal. For the technical usage of hydrogen‐related doping, knowledge of an efficient process window is desirable. In this paper, we consider proton implantation, helium and proton co‐implantation, and a proton implantation followed by a hydrogen‐plasma step as different introduction methods of HD profiles with regard to the activation efficiency of the HDs and the necessary thermal budget.