2006
DOI: 10.1002/star.200500450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrolysis of Maltoheptaose in Flow through Silicon Wafer Microreactors Containing Immobilised α‐Amylase and Glycoamylase

Abstract: In this study a silicon micro immobilised enzyme reactor (mIMER) has been applied for hydrolysis of maltoheptaose as a model maltodextrin and starch using immobilised aamylase (from Aspergillus oryzae) and glycoamylase (from Aspergillus niger). The influence of several parameters was investigated such as immobilisation chemistry, buffer constituents, pH, temperature, flow rate and substrate concentration. The conversion efficiency profile of the substrate was measured and the long-term stability of the reactor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the following steps, a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min was chosen for practical reasons. Melander et al was reported that the hydrolysis efficiency decreases rapidly with increasing a flow rate for α ‐amylase and glucoamylase immobilized on silicon wafer. The immobilized inulinase on chitosan has been reported to hydrolyse inulin in continuous process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the following steps, a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min was chosen for practical reasons. Melander et al was reported that the hydrolysis efficiency decreases rapidly with increasing a flow rate for α ‐amylase and glucoamylase immobilized on silicon wafer. The immobilized inulinase on chitosan has been reported to hydrolyse inulin in continuous process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For activation, 10 mL of 2.5% (v/v) GA was filtered through the membrane without applied pressure followed by a rinse with 50 mL of Milli‐Q water at 0.2 barg. This concentration of GA is commonly used for protein immobilization using functionalization with APTES or PEI (below) . Enzyme immobilization was completed by the filtration of ADH and subsequent wash as described for physical adsorption above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For activation, 10 mL of 2.5% ( v / v ) GA was filtered through the membrane without applied pressure followed by a rinse with 50 mL of Milli‐Q water at 0.2 barg. This concentration of GA is commonly used for protein immobilization using functionalization with APTES or PEI (below) . Enzyme immobilization was completed as described for physical adsorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEI functionalization was carried out by filtration of 10 mL 0.1% (v/v) PEI solution with no applied pressure; PEI concentrations in this range are commonly used for enzyme immobilization. 25,26 Excess PEI was removed by filtration of 50 mL of Milli-Q water at 0.2 barg. Activation with GA, enzyme immobilization, and the subsequent wash were carried out as described for APTES-GA earlier.…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation