2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrothermal alteration associated with the Chicxulub impact crater upper peak-ring breccias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2B). Perlitic cracks were observed in this interval by Kring et al (2020) as well, while Simpson et al (2020) also documented more abundant Na-dachiardite and analcime zeolites at these depths. At core level 60_1_82 (678.06 mbsf), a gradual transition is visible to a core interval with less core loss and less pervasive hydrothermal alteration features.…”
Section: Graded Suevite Unit (71001-62088 Mbsf)mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2B). Perlitic cracks were observed in this interval by Kring et al (2020) as well, while Simpson et al (2020) also documented more abundant Na-dachiardite and analcime zeolites at these depths. At core level 60_1_82 (678.06 mbsf), a gradual transition is visible to a core interval with less core loss and less pervasive hydrothermal alteration features.…”
Section: Graded Suevite Unit (71001-62088 Mbsf)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…8E). Previous work on the effects of the post-impact, alkalineintermediate hydrothermal system on the suevites in the M0077A core documented secondary alteration throughout the entire sequence but especially in the lower portion of unit 2B (Simpson et al, 2020). This high-porosity (30%-40%) and high-permeability interval (at depths of 706-689 mbsf) is also marked by the largest amount of core loss in the M0077A suevite sequence (Fig.…”
Section: Graded Suevite Unit (71001-62088 Mbsf)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…An explanation for the increase in cell abundance is the preferential channeling of fluids, and thus potentially nutrients and energy supplies, between the less-permeable limestone/marl layers above the crater and the underlying higher porosity suevite, despite the relatively low TOC in the suevite compared with the postimpact sedimentary rocks. These impact-altered, elevated-porosity materials are thought to have allowed for fluid flow, leading to their hydrothermal alteration after the impact ( Simpson et al, 2020 ). The high porosity of the suevite (∼35%), higher than typical marine sedimentary environments ( Parkes et al, 2005 ; Tanikawa et al, 2018 ), is directly linked to the deposition of this material by ocean resurge prior to its eventual burial after the impact ( Christeson et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a) are due to breakdown of pyroxene with diopside cores and hedenbergite rims. Finally, we speculate that sparitic calcite and clay minerals in the green silicate phase replaced a hyaloclastic to peperitic phase (Hooten and Ort 2002), as a consequence of pervasive, post-cratering hydrothermal overprint of the impactites (Kring et al 2020;Simpson et al 2020). It cannot be excluded, however, that portions of equigranular calcite (Fig.…”
Section: Melt Rock Formationmentioning
confidence: 87%