Objective To compare retrospectively the outcome of caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in ªstableº women with eclampsia. Design Retrospective review.Method Over the ®ve±year study period, there were 533 women with eclampsia and of these 66 women (12.4%), ful®lled the criteria of being`stable'. Of the 66 women, 37 received epidural, 27 general, and 2 spinal anaesthesia. Results There were no major complications with either general or epidural anaesthesia. Epidural anaesthesia was associated with higher one±minute Apgar scores. Conclusion This study indicates that both maternal and neonatal outcomes are not affected adversely by the use of epidural anaesthesia in selected cases of eclampsia.