2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.10.031068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Study of (ν,) and (ν¯<

Abstract: We carry out an ab initio calculation of the neutrino flux-folded inclusive cross sections measured on 12 C by the MiniBooNE and T2K Collaborations in the charged-current quasielastic regime. The calculation is based on realistic two-and three-nucleon interactions, and on a realistic nuclear electroweak current with one-and two-nucleon terms that are constructed consistently with these interactions and reproduce lowenergy electroweak transitions. Numerically exact quantum Monte Carlo methods are utilized to co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ψ nr ≡ ψ nr (|q|, ω) is a nonrelativistic scaling variable [54,62], R nr α (|q i | ∈ Q, ω) is a known nonrelativistic nuclear response function for a particular component α from a known computed set [3] Note that Ref. [54] shares a common theoretical basis with inputs used in this work [3], and also shows that good scaling behavior persists even with the inclusion of two-body dynamics. When comparing to the originally computed longitudinal nuclear response functions, this method partially removes some endemic contamination of the elastic scattering component, which would otherwise lead to over-estimations of longitudinal response function at low momentum transfers (q 300 MeV).…”
Section: B Scaling and Interpolation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where ψ nr ≡ ψ nr (|q|, ω) is a nonrelativistic scaling variable [54,62], R nr α (|q i | ∈ Q, ω) is a known nonrelativistic nuclear response function for a particular component α from a known computed set [3] Note that Ref. [54] shares a common theoretical basis with inputs used in this work [3], and also shows that good scaling behavior persists even with the inclusion of two-body dynamics. When comparing to the originally computed longitudinal nuclear response functions, this method partially removes some endemic contamination of the elastic scattering component, which would otherwise lead to over-estimations of longitudinal response function at low momentum transfers (q 300 MeV).…”
Section: B Scaling and Interpolation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(18) appears in discussions within Ref. [54], while previous discussions such as those in Ref. [63] did not take into account this small binding energy shift; removal of this shift does significantly change the scaling behavior.…”
Section: A Scaling Analysis and Densifying {R |Q| ω}-Space For Expmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, calculations of total and partial muon-capture rates and comparisons with the known experimental data will probe our model at intermediate values of momentum transfer and will be the subject of our future work. At higher energies, neutrino-nucleus cross sections calculations [33,34] are the main input to interpret the data from long and short baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments, which use nuclei as active material in the detectors. Specifically, current challenges concern the implementation of microscopic models of nuclear dynamics-that fully capture correlation effects-in neutrino event generators [35] used to simulate the neutrino interaction physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%