<i>In Situ</i> Preservation of Marine Archaeological Remains Based on Geodynamic Conditions, Raja Ampat, Indonesia

Dillenia, Ira; Troa, Rainer Arief; Triarso, Eko

doi:10.1080/13505033.2016.1182775

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many studies deal with risk assessment [12,13], management [14,15], vulnerability [16][17][18], conservation strategies [19,20] and sustainability issues [21] regarding the cultural heritage of the coastal areas of seas and oceans. However, there is a lack of studies dealing with inland shorelines of large man-made reservoirs [22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shoreline Dynamics and Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Sites on the Shores of Large Reservoirs: Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation

Nicu

Usmanov

Gainullin

et al. 2019

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decades, the number of artificial reservoirs around the world has considerably increased. This leads to the formation of new shorelines, which are highly dynamic regarding erosion and deposition processes. The present work aims to assess the direct human action along the largest reservoir in Europe—Kuibyshev (Russian Federation) and to analyse threatened cultural heritage sites from the coastal area, with the help of historical maps, UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle), and topographic surveys. This approach is a necessity, due to the oscillating water level, local change of climate, and to the continuous increasing of natural hazards (in this case coastal erosion) all over the world. Many studies are approaching coastal areas of the seas and oceans, yet there are fewer studies regarding the inland coastal areas of large artificial reservoirs. Out of the total number of 1289 cultural heritage sites around the Kuibyshev reservoir, only 90 sites are not affected by the dam building; the rest had completely disappeared under the reservoir’s water. The scenario of increasing and decreasing water level within the reservoir has shown the fact that there must be water oscillations greater than ±1 m in order to affect the cultural heritage sites. The results show that the coastal area is highly dynamic and that the complete destruction of the last remaining Palaeolithic site (Beganchik) from the shoreline of Kuibyshev reservoir is imminent, and immediate mitigation measures must be undertaken.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shoreline Dynamics and Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Sites on the Shores of Large Reservoirs: Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation

Nicu

Usmanov

Gainullin

et al. 2019

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the frequency of such storms is not a feature of the E-DBA, despite it being considered in other wreck risk assessments (e.g Landquist et al, 2016),. nor are other natural hazards that can impact wrecks, such as tectonic activity(Dillenia et al, 2016). Criteria and sensitivities for the Likelihood of Release and Ecological Impact assessments, respectively(Goodsir et al, 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Decolonising Environmental Risk Assessments of Potentially Polluting Wrecks: a Case Study of the Wreck of the USS Mississinewa in Ulithi Lagoon, Federated States of Micronesia

Hill,

Rodway-Dyer

2024

Environmental Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Millions of tonnes of oil lie entombed within wrecks from two world wars which, when released, can cause environmental devastation. Wrecks are predominantly risk assessed by the Global North Nations responsible, resulting in an epistemology that separates human from nature. This research aimed to decolonise risk assessments to capture the spatially heterogeneous nature of human vulnerability to oil pollution.Triangulation analysis of interviews and o cial reports relating to the USS Mississinewa oil spill identi ed three Global South issues a Eurocentric risk assessment failed to capture: region-speci c meteorological conditions causing the leak, remoteness making external resources slow to arrive, and the impact of the shery closure on traditional subsistence lifestyles.A vulnerability assessment is proposed to prioritise wrecks in susceptible locations. Recommendations are made for a collaborative approach to wreck management by including local voices, resisting the Global North assumption of generality, and recognising the priorities of those living with wrecks.

show abstract

Kuibyshev reservoir shore transformation as a factor of archaeological heritage objects destruction

Gainullin

Usmanov

Sharipova

et al. 2021

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents the results of long-term research carried out in the shoreline zone of the Kuibyshev reservoir, at the location of the Izmer’s complex of multitemporal archeological sites, territory the Republic of Tatarstan. “Beganchik” Paleolithic site and fortified settlement of Bolgar period “Devichiy Gorodok” were selected for detailed study. The assessment of the shoreline transformation has been carried out with the use of remote sensing data, advanced methods of field survey and geoinformation analysis. As a result the most dynamic areas have been identified. In the work, were used archival aerial images, high-resolution satellite images and results of field surveys.

show abstract

In Situ Preservation of Marine Archaeological Remains Based on Geodynamic Conditions, Raja Ampat, Indonesia

Cited by 4 publications

References 3 publications

Shoreline Dynamics and Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Sites on the Shores of Large Reservoirs: Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation

Shoreline Dynamics and Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Sites on the Shores of Large Reservoirs: Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation

Decolonising Environmental Risk Assessments of Potentially Polluting Wrecks: a Case Study of the Wreck of the USS Mississinewa in Ulithi Lagoon, Federated States of Micronesia

Kuibyshev reservoir shore transformation as a factor of archaeological heritage objects destruction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About