1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.12633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-band recombination inInxGa1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further increase of the photon energy dramatically increased a which reached values as large as 200 ps for photon energies around 2.02 eV. This behavior can be understood in relation to the conduction band structure of the In 0.48 Ga 0.52 P/ In 0.5 Al 0.5 P MQWs, 4,5 schematically shown in Fig. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further increase of the photon energy dramatically increased a which reached values as large as 200 ps for photon energies around 2.02 eV. This behavior can be understood in relation to the conduction band structure of the In 0.48 Ga 0.52 P/ In 0.5 Al 0.5 P MQWs, 4,5 schematically shown in Fig. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In bulk unstrained In 0.48 Ga 0.52 P, L 1c is approximately 0.2 eV below X 1c and can be accessible from ⌫ 1c by injecting carriers with excess energies of ϳ0.1 eV, the ⌫ 1c -L 1c separation. 5 In MQWs even lower energies are sufficient as the separation of the MQW ground state (⌫ 1e ) and L 1c is further reduced with increased carrier confinement. In addition, real space carrier transfer to the indirect X 1c valleys in the barrier (X 1c b ) may also occur in the In 0.52 Ga 0.48 P/͑Al x Ga 1Ϫx ) 0.5 In 0.5 P MQWs when the barrier composition x is selected to be larger than 0.5 and the barrier becomes indirect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased carrier confinement leads to (i) an electronic configuration in which multiple quantum wells (MQWs) of direct band-gap semiconductors become intrinsically indirect, i.e., L 1c or X 1c are the lowest conduction band states in the well, or (ii) a type II conduction band alignment with the lowest indirect conduction band state located in the barrier and the highest valence band state in the well. The former case is obtained in InGaP͞InAlP MQWs and the latter is observed in GaAs͞AlAs MQWs for well widths less than 35 Å [1,2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…E͑P c ͒ is the energy at which the unperturbed states would cross; i.e., E G ͑P c ͒ E X ͑P c ͒ and V GX is the interaction or mixing potential. In our simulation, a G was elected to be the value of dE p ͞dp measured close to atmospheric pressure, and a X was set equal to 216 meV͞GPa, a typical value for the X pressure coefficient, and equal to that measured in InAs͞GaAs QDs [1,12,14]. Using a G , a X , and considering the X-excitonic band-gap energy to vary with dot size as E dot X 2.3 1 135.8992͞d 1.7165 [15], P c was calculated for each dot size within the ensemble.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%