1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.4446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-point backfolding in orderedGaInP2determined by electroabsorption measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that results presented in Ref. [5] for [0 0 1] ordering are tenuous, with better evidence being obtained from Raman studies [23], electroabsorption [24] and high pressure fitting work [16].…”
Section: Sample Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shows that results presented in Ref. [5] for [0 0 1] ordering are tenuous, with better evidence being obtained from Raman studies [23], electroabsorption [24] and high pressure fitting work [16].…”
Section: Sample Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A similar process can be undertaken for other work where suitable information is provided [16] correcting for compressive and tensile strains. Kippenberg et al [7,24] showed by electroabsorption that DE BGR is not entirely due to the shift in the conduction band, but that 22% of it comes from the valenceband maximum being shifted up with ordering. Based on this assumption we have produced Fig.…”
Section: Sample Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). Based on this linear approach, our predicted pressure coefficient at the proposed maximum ∆E BGR compared to the theoretical work of [4] would seem to back up the proposal of [7,9] Without a study of layers from different growth techniques coupled with consistent characterisation the current results present the best and only determination to date of the effects of ordering on the pressure coefficient of GaInP nominally lattice matched to GaAs. We propose a relative determination between samples from Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The best fit to the current experimental data is found in [7] to be that proposed by [8] and gives a maximum value for ∆E BGR of 0.223 eV. Kippenberg et al [9] showed by electroabsorption that ∆E BGR is not due entirely to the shift in the conduction band, but that 22% of it comes from the valence band maximum being shifted up with ordering. They were able to apply exact linear fits against ∆E BGR to the absolute band structure data measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The reason for the failure to observe E + transitions in the PR spectra of the samples with y = 0.005 and 0.010 will be discussed below. The features observed ~0.4-0.5 eV above the 0 E (or E -) transition for samples with y = 0, 0.005, and 0.010 originate from the back-folded conduction L band induced by ordering effect [12]. These features are relatively weak due to the very weak coupling of the back-folded L states with the original Γ point states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%