2016
DOI: 10.3201/eid2203.151870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycobacterium microtiInfection in Dairy Goats, France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mycobacterial species causing tuberculosis in humans and animals are part of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) [1], which includes Mycobacterium microti, a microorganism initially identified in England as a pathogen of wild rodents, such as field voles (Microtus agrestis), wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and shrews (Sorex araneus) [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This pathogen causes natural infections in a wide range of wild and domestic animals, but in recent years, an increasing number of infections have been described in pets (cats and dogs) [8][9][10][11], wildlife (wild boar and badger) [12][13][14][15][16] and livestock (goat and cattle) [17][18][19][20]. In humans, M. microti is rarely reported as a zoonotic agent; however, its full pathogenic potential has not yet been defined [11,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycobacterial species causing tuberculosis in humans and animals are part of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) [1], which includes Mycobacterium microti, a microorganism initially identified in England as a pathogen of wild rodents, such as field voles (Microtus agrestis), wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and shrews (Sorex araneus) [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This pathogen causes natural infections in a wide range of wild and domestic animals, but in recent years, an increasing number of infections have been described in pets (cats and dogs) [8][9][10][11], wildlife (wild boar and badger) [12][13][14][15][16] and livestock (goat and cattle) [17][18][19][20]. In humans, M. microti is rarely reported as a zoonotic agent; however, its full pathogenic potential has not yet been defined [11,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the field vole (Microtus agrestis) is considered the maintenance host for M. microti, a role that similarly might be played by other small mammals [44,45]. This MTC member seems to be more widespread and infecting more species than previously thought, and has been recently identified in domestic and wild populations in France and northeastern Spain [46][47][48]. We did not detect M. microti, but it could also be that its prevalence is not high enough to favor the detection of infected animals, considering the limitations of our sample size and spatial scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those early or latent stages, with infection confirmed by either immunology or bacteriological culture but with an absence of detectable pathology, are usual in badgers and have less risk of shedding greater numbers of mycobacteria than badgers in the late stages of disease [ 37 ]. We cannot exclude that other members of the MTC were present but not recovered by culture and cross-react in P22 ELISA, i.e., Mycobacterium microti infections have been reported in both wildlife [ 42 , 43 ] and domestic animals [ 44 , 45 ] in France, although the direct detection of that species on tissue samples was not included in this study. On the other hand, the relative specificity of each method with respect to the other remained much higher for isolation (97.45% vs. 78.27% for culture and P22 ELISA, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%