1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.882759
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RF Superconductivity for Accelerators

Abstract: Bring home now the book enPDFd rf superconductivity for accelerators to be your sources when going to read. It can be your new collection to not only display in your racks but also be the one that can help you fining the best sources. As in common, book is the window to get in the world and you can open the world easily. These wise words are really familiar with you, isn't it?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
761
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(776 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
761
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both R 0 fl and R 1 fl were observed to display a steep minimum when the electron mean free path l approximately matches the BCS coherence length, ξ 0 ≅ 33 nm. This result casts some doubt on the validity of the commonly accepted explanation [5,6], in particular as an independent measurement of H c2 [7] was in conflict with earlier measurements used in the argumentation developed in Reference [6]. It was instead proposed in Reference [1] that pinning should provide the dominant contribution to R fl .…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both R 0 fl and R 1 fl were observed to display a steep minimum when the electron mean free path l approximately matches the BCS coherence length, ξ 0 ≅ 33 nm. This result casts some doubt on the validity of the commonly accepted explanation [5,6], in particular as an independent measurement of H c2 [7] was in conflict with earlier measurements used in the argumentation developed in Reference [6]. It was instead proposed in Reference [1] that pinning should provide the dominant contribution to R fl .…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…As most models of fluxon dynamics [3,4] predict R fl ≅ R n H ext / H c2 , R n being the value of the surface resistance in the normal conducting state and H c2 the upper critical field, this difference between films and bulk has been blamed [5,6] on a similar difference between the values taken by H c2 . In Reference [1] R fl was measured for a large variety of films spanning a wide range of electron mean free paths and the evolution of R 0 fl anf R 1 fl was tracked for the first time from the dirty limit (films containing more than 10 atomic percent of neon) to the clean limit (deep-drawn bulk niobium subsequently annealed at 1100°C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying this technique it has been possible to raise the threshold for field emission in multicell cavities from about 10 MV͞m to more than 20 MV͞m in the past few years. The topics of thermal instability and field emission are discussed at much greater detail in the book by Padamsee, Knobloch, and Hays [16].…”
Section: Thermal Instability and Field Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next we present hRRRi and T c measurements in Nb thin films that were grown on a-sapphire and MgO crystal substrates. The hRRRi is here defined [1] as the ratio of resistivity at 300 K to that at 10 K, averaged across the film thickness. This bulk averaged hRRRi is different from the local RRR (at any depth in the film) because our measurement averages the RRR across the film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%