2016
DOI: 10.1080/21622515.2016.1259358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhizobacteria and phytoremediation of heavy metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They limit bioavailability of metals by forming complexes with siderophores, particular metabolites, and bacterial transporters ( Rajkumar et al, 2010 ; Ahemad, 2012 ). These microorganisms of agronomic importance have evolved various mechanisms to avoid heavy metal stress including: (a) transport of metals across cytoplasmic membrane; (b) biosorption and bioaccumulation to the cell walls; (c) metal entrapment in the extracellular capsules; (d) heavy metals precipitation; and (e) metal detoxification via oxidation–reduction ( Zubair et al, 2016 ). Heavy-metal-tolerant PGPR including Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces , and Methylobacterium have the potential to improve growth and production of crops by reducing the detrimental effects of heavy metals ( Sessitsch et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Microbial Remediation Of Heavy Metals For Plant Growth Promomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They limit bioavailability of metals by forming complexes with siderophores, particular metabolites, and bacterial transporters ( Rajkumar et al, 2010 ; Ahemad, 2012 ). These microorganisms of agronomic importance have evolved various mechanisms to avoid heavy metal stress including: (a) transport of metals across cytoplasmic membrane; (b) biosorption and bioaccumulation to the cell walls; (c) metal entrapment in the extracellular capsules; (d) heavy metals precipitation; and (e) metal detoxification via oxidation–reduction ( Zubair et al, 2016 ). Heavy-metal-tolerant PGPR including Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces , and Methylobacterium have the potential to improve growth and production of crops by reducing the detrimental effects of heavy metals ( Sessitsch et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Microbial Remediation Of Heavy Metals For Plant Growth Promomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to scientific literature date [10,13,25,49,51], soil demetallization technologies are characterized by: 1) a high degree of metal recovery (in some cases up to 95-95%); 2) low productivity of installations (from 10 to 300 tons of soil per day); 3) the high cost of cleaning (100-450 USD per 1 m3 of soil). It is also necessary to note that a soil that has undergone a full treatment cycle often loses a number of its leading properties.…”
Section: Ex Situ Healthy Of Contaminated Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, technologies of active direct inactivation of metals are implemented. The second implements technologies of active indirect inactivation of metals [12,14,32,51].…”
Section: Return Cleared Soil Back To Point Of Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heavy-metal stressed plants may protect themselves from reactive oxygen species thought the production of antioxidant enzymes or scavenger compounds [123]. Recently, PGP bacteria, including rhizobia, have been shown to reduce the toxicity of plant exposure to heavy metals [124,125]. Heavy-metal contaminated soil remediation can be performed with different strategies [126].…”
Section: Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobia In Heavy Metal Contaminated mentioning
confidence: 99%