2005
DOI: 10.1086/431894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpitzerView on the Evolution of Star‐forming Galaxies fromz= 0 toz∼ 3

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

59
595
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(667 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
59
595
11
Order By: Relevance
“…We find a slight decrease of the IR LD from z = 1.3 to z = 2.3 due to a decrease in the contribution of LIRGs and "normal" galaxies. At z ∼ 2 the IR LD of the Universe is still dominated by LIRGs and not by ULIRGs, contrary to previous claims (e.g., Pérez-González et al 2005). Using the best fit of our infrared LF, we infer that at z ∼ 2 LIRGs and ULIRGs have an IR LD of 4.5 × 10 8 L Mpc −1 and 1.5 × 10 8 L Mpc −1 respectively and that they account for 49% and 17% of the total IR LD respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…We find a slight decrease of the IR LD from z = 1.3 to z = 2.3 due to a decrease in the contribution of LIRGs and "normal" galaxies. At z ∼ 2 the IR LD of the Universe is still dominated by LIRGs and not by ULIRGs, contrary to previous claims (e.g., Pérez-González et al 2005). Using the best fit of our infrared LF, we infer that at z ∼ 2 LIRGs and ULIRGs have an IR LD of 4.5 × 10 8 L Mpc −1 and 1.5 × 10 8 L Mpc −1 respectively and that they account for 49% and 17% of the total IR LD respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…These results are now confirmed and extended by the data coming from the Spitzer Space Telescope (e.g. Gruppioni et al 2005;Le Floc'h et al 2005;Pérez-González et al 2005;Babbedge et al 2006;Caputi et al 2007). On the contrary, the evolution of AGN at MIR wavelengths are similar to what has been measured in the optical and X-ray bands for type 1 AGN (AGN1) and even slower for type 2 AGN (Matute et al 2002(Matute et al , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…All infraredbased estimates are compared to the optical/rest-frame UV estimates compiled in Hopkins & Beacom (2006) which have been corrected for dust extinction, and therefore represent an approximation to the total star formation rate density in the Universe at a given epoch. The total infrared estimates from the literature (integrated over ∼10 8 − 10 13.5 L ) come from Spitzer samples Pérez-González et al, 2005;Caputi et al, 2007;Rodighiero et al, 2010;Magnelli et al, 2011) and Herschel samples . In contrast, several samples from the submm and mm are also included; although they are known to be incomplete, they provide a benchmark lower limits for the true contributions from their respective populations.…”
Section: Contribution To Cosmic Star Formation Rate Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L < 10 11 L ) in blue, the LIRG population (10 11 < L < 10 12 L ) in yellow-orange, and the ULIRG population (10 12 < L < 10 13 L ) in red. The literature sources of each estimate are given by different symbols or line-types as indicated Pérez-González et al, 2005;Hopkins & Beacom, 2006;Caputi et al, 2007;Magnelli et al, 2011Magnelli et al, , 2013bMurphy et al, 2011;Casey, 2012). Note that not all literature derivations of different luminosity bins are computationally equivalent since some luminosities are derived directly from the far-infrared bands while others are extrapolations from mid-infrared bands.…”
Section: Contribution To Cosmic Star Formation Rate Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%