2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0040-747x.2004.00339.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ETHNIC RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION IN THE USA, 1980–2000

Abstract: Although there are many studies of the residential segregation of ethnic groups in cities in various parts of the world, very few address the degree to which segregation levels vary across an urban system, let alone rigorously analyse those variations. Data on segregation across all US Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in 1980 and 2000 at the census tract scale have been analysed, using a modified index of isolation, to examine variations in segregation levels, according to their size, the relative size of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton have been influential in setting the research agenda by identifying five conceptual dimensions: evenness, exposure, concentration, centralisation and clustering (Massey and Denton 1988). Although Asian and Hispanic segregation increased in the USA during the 1980s and 1990s when the exposure dimension of segregation is measured using the isolation index (Johnston et al 2004), other measures show no change or decrease in segregation (Iceland et al 2002). In the UK different indices show ethnic residential segregation increasing or decreasing (Simpson 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton have been influential in setting the research agenda by identifying five conceptual dimensions: evenness, exposure, concentration, centralisation and clustering (Massey and Denton 1988). Although Asian and Hispanic segregation increased in the USA during the 1980s and 1990s when the exposure dimension of segregation is measured using the isolation index (Johnston et al 2004), other measures show no change or decrease in segregation (Iceland et al 2002). In the UK different indices show ethnic residential segregation increasing or decreasing (Simpson 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the most isolated communities have modified isolation (MI) indices only slightly higher than 0.10; the scale goes up to 1. In comparison, Johnston et al (2004) showed that MI indices can exceed 0.5 for BBlack^communities in some American metropolitan areas; the mean was 0.253 in 1980 and 0.208 in 2000. However, in contexts where many immigrant communities coexist in the same neighborhoods, a non-isolated community could still have little residential proximity to the majority group.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Residential Isolation Immigrant Commmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They propose exogenous factors to explain their results, such as discrimination, housing markets, and group preferences (Johnston et al 2004). Canadian cities can hardly be compared to American ones; the racial diversity in Canada is much more recent than in the United States and results from Canada's recent immigration policies rather than historical reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…International comparative studies are hampered by variations or data consistency relating to the definition of ethnicity and the spatial scale at which data is made available and analysed (see Johnston et al 2004). Unlike international comparative studies, intra-national studies ensure data consistency due to the use of single sources, usually the national census.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%