2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00622.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrio vulnificusmetalloprotease VvpE is essentially required for swarming

Abstract: Bacterial swarming constitutes a good in vitro model for surface adherence and colonization, and is accompanied by expressions of virulence factors related to invasiveness. In this study, it was determined that Vibrio vulnificus swarming was abolished by mutation of the vvpE gene encoding a metalloprotease VvpE and this swarming defect was recovered by complementation of the vvpE gene. Expression of the vvpE gene began simultaneously with the beginning of swarming and increased along with expression of the lux… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metalloproteases have a variety of putative roles, and thus the significance of this high-level expression can only be hypothesized. Metalloprotease expression has previously been shown to affect surface adherence and colonization by Vibrio vulnificus due to an effect on swarming behaviour (Kim et al, 2007); however, metalloproteases may also be involved in mammalian tissue toxicity (Bowen et al, 2003) and may be important in disease pathology. The putative intimin is likely to act as an adhesin in the gut whilst the putative ShET2-like enterotoxin (YPO1002) is likely to play a role in the pathology of Y. pseudotuberculosis infection by altering the permeability of the epithelial cells of the intestinal wall and causing diarrhoea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metalloproteases have a variety of putative roles, and thus the significance of this high-level expression can only be hypothesized. Metalloprotease expression has previously been shown to affect surface adherence and colonization by Vibrio vulnificus due to an effect on swarming behaviour (Kim et al, 2007); however, metalloproteases may also be involved in mammalian tissue toxicity (Bowen et al, 2003) and may be important in disease pathology. The putative intimin is likely to act as an adhesin in the gut whilst the putative ShET2-like enterotoxin (YPO1002) is likely to play a role in the pathology of Y. pseudotuberculosis infection by altering the permeability of the epithelial cells of the intestinal wall and causing diarrhoea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentric rings of V. vulnificus on low-viscosity agar are more likely related to stationary phase responses to nutrient limitation or perhaps to biofilm formation that occurs at the air-liquid interface. V. vulnificus vvpE mutants described elsewhere are also defective in ring formation (Kim et al, 2007), and since gacA mutants show reduced protease activity and vvpE transcript levels, these defects may also contribute to the differential growth on motility agar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, the AI-2 bioassay is known to be too vulnerable to accurately measure the activity of AI-2-QSS (24). Similarly, the luxS expression level alone may not represent actual AI-2-QSS activity because AI-2 production is mediated by several spontaneous non-enzymatic reactions, as well as the enzymatic action of LuxS (10 In V. vulnificus, AI-2 production is mediated by the enzymatic action of LuxS (13,18), and AI-2 signaling is transferred to the master regulator SmcR (a LuxR homolog) via LuxO and LuxT (25). It has been well documented that vvpE transcription is positively or negatively regulated by luxS, luxO, or smcR mutations, respectively (6,13).…”
Section: According To Our Results Scts Stimulates V Vulnificusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCR product was then subcloned into pQF52 (15). From the resulting plasmid pRC130, the BamHI-ScaI fragment containing the P luxS ::lacZ fragment was isolated and subcloned into pDM4 (18). The resulting plasmid pRC136 was transformed into E. coli SY327 λpir and SM10 λpir (14), and transferred to CMM2101 by conjugation.…”
Section: Rep-f With a Bamhi Overhang And Luxs-rep-r With Amentioning
confidence: 99%