2017
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2017.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice flux evolution in fast flowing areas of the Greenland ice sheet over the 20th and 21st centuries

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This study investigates the evolution of Greenland ice sheet flux focusing on five of the main fast flowing regions (Petermann glacier, North East Greenland Ice Stream, Kangerdlugssuaq glacier, Helheim glacier and Jakobshavn glacier) in response to 20th and 21st century climate change. A hybrid (shallow ice and shallow shelf) ice-sheet model (ISM) is forced with the combined outputs of a set of seven CMIP5 models and the regional climate model MAR. The ISM simulates the present-day ice velocity patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(207 reference statements)
5
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5G-H). This increase-decrease ice velocity pattern has been also reported by Peano et al (2017), using GRISLI forced by CMIP5 models under the RCP8.5 scenario.…”
Section: Grislisupporting
confidence: 83%
“…5G-H). This increase-decrease ice velocity pattern has been also reported by Peano et al (2017), using GRISLI forced by CMIP5 models under the RCP8.5 scenario.…”
Section: Grislisupporting
confidence: 83%
“…the extension of the geographical domain and the duration of the simulated period. For century scale applications, the resolution varies 15 from 5 km for Greenland to 15 km for Antarctica (Peano et al, 2017;Ritz et al, 2015). For multi-millenial applications the resolution increases to 15 km for Greenland and 40 km for the whole Northern Hemisphere and Antarctica.…”
Section: Numerical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greve and Otsu (2007) succeed in reproducing a correct magnitude of its speed by increasing the basal sliding under the NEGIS by 3 orders of magnitude relative to the rest of the ice sheet, but they fail in reproducing its geometry. A good agreement between model and data is found in Price et al (2011) and Peano et al (2017), who use a spatially variable basal friction coefficient derived from an iterative inverse method to match the observed velocities. Our imperfect reproduction of the NEGIS is probably related to a combination of low spatial resolution (10 km) and problems in capturing the dynamics at the base of the ice sheet.…”
Section: Model Performance On the Whole Grismentioning
confidence: 71%