2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICT-specific technological change and productivity growth in the US: 1980–2004

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper studies the impact of information and communication technologies (ICT) on US economic growth using a dynamic general equilibrium approach. A production function with six different capital inputs is used, three of them corresponding to ICT assets and the other three to non-ICT assets. The technological change embedded in hardware equipment is found to be the main leading non-neutral force in US productivity growth, accounting for about one quarter of total growth during the period 1980… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This broader conceptual approach may result in a more appropriate speci…cation of the regression to be estimated An additional extension could involve exploring the way non-R&D innovation resources may be utilised for physical capital accumulation rather than impacting directly on TFP growth. Indeed, as long as a signi…cant part of non-R&D investment can be seen as an investment in new (and more innovative) machinery, it is reasonable to deal with it as an embedded technological progress (see, for instance, Martinez et al, 2008Martinez et al, , 2010, which indirectly a¤ects the technology frontier of the economy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This broader conceptual approach may result in a more appropriate speci…cation of the regression to be estimated An additional extension could involve exploring the way non-R&D innovation resources may be utilised for physical capital accumulation rather than impacting directly on TFP growth. Indeed, as long as a signi…cant part of non-R&D investment can be seen as an investment in new (and more innovative) machinery, it is reasonable to deal with it as an embedded technological progress (see, for instance, Martinez et al, 2008Martinez et al, , 2010, which indirectly a¤ects the technology frontier of the economy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samaniego (2007) extends this analysis to the inclusion of investments in knowledge assets, finding that R&D-driven technical change, rather than TFP, explains output growth in developed countries. Venturini (2007) and Martínez et al (2010) reveal the importance of ICT-driven technical change in promoting productivity growth in the US. However, the relative importance of investment-specific technical change, next to other possible ways in which capital assets can affect growth, is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this literature has primarily focused on the European countries and America. Examples of such studies include [2][3][4][5][6] on America, [7,8] on the UK, [9] on Finland, [10] on Spain, [11] on Greece, and [12] on industry-level comparisons between the Europe and the United States. Based on this, we examine the contributions of ICT sectors to Chinese national economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%