Idealisasi Sifat Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi

Sugianto, Fajar; Simeon, Felicia Christina; Wibowo, Dea Prasetyawati

doi:10.30996/jhbbc.v3i2.3525

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Peace is not only on the first day of the session, but also at every session. This is in accordance with the nature of civil cases that the litigation initiative comes from the parties, therefore the parties can also end it peacefully through the mediation of the panel of judges before the District Court session (Sugianto et al, 2020).…”

Section: Results and Discussion 31 The Process Of Settlement Of Civil...supporting

confidence: 54%

Prospects for Settlement of Civil Cases Through Mediation in State Courts Based on Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 2016

Ahmad

2021

Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The process of examining civil cases (lawsuits) in District Courts, such as at the Class IA Bale Bandung District Court is carried out through several stages, namely from the administrative process, to the examination in front of the trial/trial proceedings, one of which is a peace event (mediation), which carried out at the beginning of the trial, the procedure for which is currently regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts, which revokes and declares that Perma Number 1 of 2008, whose implementation is considered ineffective. Based on the background and problems discussed in this thesis, the objectives of this study are as follows: To find out and analyze the process of resolving civil cases through mediation at the Class IA Bale Bandung District Court based on Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court, and the prospect of settling civil cases through mediation at the Class IA Bale Bandung District Court based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court. This study finds answers, namely that: the process of settling civil cases through mediation at the Class IA Bale Bandung District Court based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts has been carried out optimally, but the results of case settlement through mediation have not been achieved optimally and settlement of civil cases through mediation at the Class IA Bale Bandung District Court based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts has good prospects, if judges, mediators, and advocates are able to motivate and encourage litigants to settle the case amicably through mediation in order to accelerate the settlement of the case. In connection with the results of the study, the authors submit the following suggestions: In order for the implementation of the settlement of civil cases through mediation in the District Court based on the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts, the results are more optimal, one of which is the need for a mediator who has high integrity and impartiality supported by the ability to listen, ask questions, observe, interview, counsel and negotiate; and it is necessary to socialize the Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 2016 intensively to all elements of the legal profession to better understand the objectives of the PERMA.

show abstract

Section: Results and Discussion 31 The Process Of Settlement Of Civil...supporting

confidence: 54%

Prospects for Settlement of Civil Cases Through Mediation in State Courts Based on Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 2016

Ahmad

2021

Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Meskipun mediasi dilakukan di kedua lingkungan yang berbeda, prinsip-prinsip dasar penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi harus tetap dijalankan, seperti: pemberdayaan para pihak, netralitas, kerahasiaan, netralitas, dan mencapai kesepakatan win-win solution dapat terupaya (Sugianto et al, 2020). Prinsip win-win solution yang dihadirkan melalui mediasi diharapkan dapat menanamkan rasa kepada para pihak agar yang menang tidak merasa menang maupun sebaliknya.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Urgensi Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Elektronik Dalam Era Disrupsi

Amrin

2023

j. pertanah.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRAKIndonesia telah memasuki era industri 4.0 yang ditandai adanya disrupsi dari segala sektor. Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional (ATR/BPN) menyambut hal ini dengan berbagai transformasi digital untuk memenuhi kebutuhan layanan publik. Salah satu layanan publik yang belum dilaksanakan perubahan dari sistem konvensional menuju sistem elektronik adalah mediasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah membahas urgensi kebutuhan mediasi elektronik dalam menunjang layanan publik. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari peraturan perundangan-undangan dan kajian pustaka. Pendekatan analisis konten untuk mengetahui implementasi mediasi elektronik di luar penyelesaian kasus pertanahan dan urgensi penerapannya melalui analisis SWOT. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa mediasi elektronik dapat dilakukan sesuai dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 diiringi dengan perbaikan pada kelemahan dan ancaman yang dapat terjadi agar kendala-kendala yang ada dapat terminimalisir. Kementerian ATR/BPN belum memiliki peraturan atau pedoman secara khusus terkait penyelesaian kasus pertanahan secara elektronik. Mediasi elektronik mampu menyelesaikan permasalahan terkait ketidakhadiran para pihak yang berkasus. Kendala yang paling banyak ditemukan dalam implementasi mediasi elektronik seperti kualitas mediator dan jaringan internet yang belum merata. Solusi yang dapat diberikan adalah peningkatan kualitas mediator dan pembuatan pedoman penyelesaian kasus pertanahan melalui mediasi. ABSTRACTIndonesia has entered the industrial era 4.0 was marked by disruption from all sectors. The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency of Republic Indonesia welcomed this with various digital transformations to meet the needs of public services. One of the public services that has not implemented a change from a conventional system to an electronic system is mediation. The purpose of this study is to discuss the urgency of the need for electronic mediation in supporting public services. The method used is descriptive qualitative with secondary data collection obtained from laws and regulations and literature review. A content analysis approach to find out the implementation of electronic mediation outside of resolving land cases and the urgency of its implementation through a SWOT analysis. The results of this study are that electronic mediation can be carried out in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2022 accompanied by improvements to weaknesses and threats that can occur so that existing obstacles can be minimized. The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency of Republic Indonesia does not yet have specific regulations or guidelines regarding the electronic resolution of land cases. Electronic mediation is able to solve problems related to the absence of the parties involved in the case. The most common obstacles found in the implementation of electronic mediation are the uneven quality of mediators and internet networks. Solutions that can be given are improving the quality of mediators and making guidelines for settling land cases through mediation.

show abstract

“…28 Mediation is conducted to resolve the disputes among parties with the peace. 29 Meditation, in the context of industrial relations in Indonesia, includes the settlement of disputes on rights, disputes of interests, disputes of termination of an employment relationship, the dispute among trade or labor unions within one enterprise through deliberation mediated by one or more neutral mediators. In industrial relations, a mediator is a government employee who is accountable for the Manpower area and meets the Minister's mediator standards.…”

Section: Meditation Conceptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Analysis of The Policy of Mediation Time in The Employment Disputes Settlement

Pangestu

Fitri

2022

MuLaRev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relationship among stakeholders in an industrial environment does not always run well. The conflicts within an industrial relationship are common, and they are known as industrial relation disputes. However, the disputes must be settled such as by mediation. This study aimed to analyze and investigate the 30 (thirty) day mediation period specified by Article 15 of the PPHI Law for the settlement of industrial relation disputes by the mediator. This study is a normative legal study utilizing a statutory approach and a case approach in which legal materials were gained through literature review. It was found that the settlement period must be completed by the mediator was ideally considering two aspects: the number of cases and the number of mediators. The researchers suggested that the provisions of Article 15 of the PPHI Law cannot be implemented equally; due to each region have the different number of cases and the number of mediators. In addition, the non-ideal number of functional mediators was taking into account the aspect of the number of cases received, so currently the service and technical implementation of the settlements do not run optimally. Based on the results of the study, the researcher suggests the stakeholders: first, to revise Article 15 of the PPHI Law, which is related to the period of time for the mediator in completing the duties. Second, to increase the number of functional mediators by considering the number of cases received.

show abstract

Idealisasi Sifat Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Prospects for Settlement of Civil Cases Through Mediation in State Courts Based on Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 2016

Prospects for Settlement of Civil Cases Through Mediation in State Courts Based on Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 2016

Urgensi Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Elektronik Dalam Era Disrupsi

Critical Analysis of The Policy of Mediation Time in The Employment Disputes Settlement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About