Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City

Duan, Yaming; Wang, Hui; Huang, An; Xu, Yao; Lu, Lixin; Ji, Zhengxin

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105457

Cited by 110 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the concept and method of PLES, researchers could identify the spatial characteristics and laws of land use more clearly, in order to provide a scientific basis for the optimal allocation of land resources. The research focused on PLES includes "spatial identification and pattern evolution analysis [9], spatial classification and livability/coordination/function evaluation [41], and spatial optimization and planning applications [42]". Furthermore, the research scales have covered different levels of administrative units or physical geographical zones.…”

Section: Ples and Land Usementioning

confidence: 99%

“…"Production-Living-Ecological Space (PLES)" is a new tool for implementing Spatial Planning. In specific operations, areas need to be divided into three types of space: "Production Space (PS), Living Space (LS), and Ecological Space (ES)" [9]. From the perspective of land use, a certain land use type usually has one or more of the functions of production, living, and ecological [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective

Chen

Zhang

Liang

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) is a useful tool to identify land use status patterns and optimize land resource allocation. In this study, the spatial econometric model was chosen to analyze the driving factors of land use change in Chaoyang District, part of the rural–urban fringe in Beijing, from the perspective of PLES evolution, from 2005 to 2020. The results showed the following: (1) Production Space (PS) to Living-Non-Farm Production Space (LNPS) has been the most significant conversion process of PLES since 2005, making LNPS the PLES type with the highest proportion in the study area. (2) With the spatial order from near-to-far from the city center, the scale of PS was reduced and concentrated, Ecological Space (ES) was formed in a green belt at the periphery of Beijing, Eco-Agricultural Production Space (EAPS) and Living-Agricultural Production Space were rapidly reduced, and LNPS was rapidly expanded in the point-line-plane order. (3) The PS to LNPS conversion was mainly driven by economic development and industrial structure upgrades, while the PS to ES conversion was mainly due to the distribution of population density and also industrial structures. The conversion of EAPS to LNPS was driven by the increase of the urbanization rate and economic growth. This study confirmed the policy-driven effect of the conversion from PS to ES. Due to the “Concentric Circle” spatial structure of Beijing, the conversion of PLES is generally related to the distance from the city center.

show abstract

Section: Ples and Land Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective

Chen

Zhang

Liang

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This paper measures the dominance and diversity of LUFs from the perspective of LUFs' value, which can provide an important viewpoint for the identification and the optimization of ecological-production-living space. The ecological-production-living space is the dominant functional space [49,50]. However, it failed to identify land use dominant function as prior physical quantity accounting units of LUFs are not directly comparable.…”

Section: Implications For Identification and Optimization Of Ecological-production-living Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China

Liu

Wang

et al. 2021

Land

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding land use functions (LUFs) value is critical for implementing sustainable land resources management and optimizing territorial space in China. However, existing research insufficiently portrays the contributions of land use to economic activity and people’s well-being. To address this crucial absence, this paper attempts to clarify the connotation of LUFs’ value and the logic of LUFs’ optimization under the national territorial space planning system by applying the “demand–function–value” integrated framework. Based on this framework and taking Zhangjiakou City as a case study, we classified LUFs into economic, social, and ecological functions. Then, we assessed the monetary value of LUFs at the grid level using spatialization and environmental economics methods. Besides, we analyzed the evolutionary characteristics of LUFs and their diversity and dominance. The results showed that the total value of economic, social, and ecological LUFs increased continuously between 1990 and 2015. Spatially, the ecological function showed an opposite pattern to that of social and economic functions. Additionally, the dominant role shifted from ecological function to social function, and the dominant functional combination changed from ELP-ENS-ST to SP-ENS-ELT over this period. Lastly, this paper proposes that policymakers identify and optimize ecological–production–living space through LUFs’ value assessment and coordination. The results provide a new methodological insight into the assessment and coordination of LUFs and adaptive land use management.

show abstract

“…Elements and structures comprise the basis to realize the basic functions of the land space [ 13 , 14 ]. Analysis of the evolution of the spatial form and structure constitutes a means to explore the change process of spatial functions [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. According to the functional attributes of spaces, the PLES theory divides the land space into the PS, LS and ES [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Regional Differences in the Production-Living-Ecological Space of the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River

Zhao

Cheng

Zhu

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, which is the second largest urban agglomeration in China, represents a typical land space range of ecological vulnerability in China. Large differences occur in economic development mode between resource- and non-resource-based cities in this basin area. Accurate identification of the evolution and regional differences in the production-living-ecological space (PLES) is very important in order to elucidate the development and utilization of land space in the region. At present, relevant research has largely focused on the classification and determination of PLES temporal and spatial patterns. Temporal and spatial pattern research has mainly considered a single scale of administrative division, whereas fewer studies have analyzed the temporal and spatial patterns and regional differences in the PLES in ecologically fragile natural watersheds. Therefore, based on PLES classification, the regional differences in the PLES between two types of cities in the basin are measured via the Theil index and exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA). First, the ecological space (ES) of these two types of cities in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is compressed by the production space (PS) and living space (LS), in which the ES of resource-based cities is compressed for a longer period, and the phenomenon involving PS compression by the LS and ES mainly occurs in non-resource-based cities within the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Second, the PLES of these two types of cities exhibits the characteristics of spatial aggregation, and high- and low-density areas of the PLES remain relatively stable. Third, the regional differences in the PLES of the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River mainly originate from intraregional differences. The PLES of these two types of cities in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is more sensitive to changes in economic development than to those in the population distribution.

show abstract

Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City

Cited by 110 publications

References 36 publications

Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective

Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective

Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Regional Differences in the Production-Living-Ecological Space of the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About