2018
DOI: 10.1111/aje.12513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of African antelope species: Using thermographic videos to test the efficacy of real‐time thermography

Abstract: The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a project on tools for quantifying biodiversity and assessing management outcomes in a South-African savannah ecosystem yielded three publications that included undergraduate students as co-authors but did not explicitly refer to this anywhere in the manuscript (Goodenough et al, 2017(Goodenough et al, , 2020Hart et al, 2020). It also yielded two publications that clearly described the inclusion of 50 undergraduate students in the methods section but did not include any of them as co-authors and did not list their names in the acknowledgements (Goodenough et al, 2018a(Goodenough et al, , 2018b. The project is an exemplar of RFEL yet is inconsistent in attributing credit to participants.…”
Section: Barriers To Real-world Impact and Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a project on tools for quantifying biodiversity and assessing management outcomes in a South-African savannah ecosystem yielded three publications that included undergraduate students as co-authors but did not explicitly refer to this anywhere in the manuscript (Goodenough et al, 2017(Goodenough et al, , 2020Hart et al, 2020). It also yielded two publications that clearly described the inclusion of 50 undergraduate students in the methods section but did not include any of them as co-authors and did not list their names in the acknowledgements (Goodenough et al, 2018a(Goodenough et al, , 2018b. The project is an exemplar of RFEL yet is inconsistent in attributing credit to participants.…”
Section: Barriers To Real-world Impact and Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveying the large areas required for robust abundance estimates in a cost-effective way is also problematic [3,10]. In response to this, drones (also known as remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)) are rapidly being recognised as efficient and highly effective tools for wildlife monitoring [8,10,11,[13][14][15][16]. Drones can cover large areas systematically, using pre-programmed flight paths [16] and carry sensors that capture data at a resolution high enough for accurate wildlife detection [10,13,14,17], even for relatively small mammals such as koalas [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%