2000
DOI: 10.1006/jema.2000.0338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of birds as biological markers along a neotropical urban–rural gradient (Cayenne, French Guiana), using co-inertia analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were consistent with other studies and results from other cities showing that the Conservation Ecology 7(1): 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art5 number of species declines with increasing urbanization and that the remaining group of species is dominated by highly abundant species (e.g., Emlen 1974, Campbell and Dagg 1976, Lancaster and Rees 1979, Edgar and Kershaw 1994. The patterns of urbanization, however, have rarely been examined in terms of the habitat mosaic, including both local-and landscape-level attributes characterized by gradient analysis (but see Blair 1996, Bolger et al 1997, Rottenborn 1999, Reynaud and Thioulouse 2000. In the present study, when we characterized the gradient to include mosaic composition, interesting community trends emerged.…”
Section: Declining Numbers Of Bird Species Along a Gradient Of Urbanimentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results were consistent with other studies and results from other cities showing that the Conservation Ecology 7(1): 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art5 number of species declines with increasing urbanization and that the remaining group of species is dominated by highly abundant species (e.g., Emlen 1974, Campbell and Dagg 1976, Lancaster and Rees 1979, Edgar and Kershaw 1994. The patterns of urbanization, however, have rarely been examined in terms of the habitat mosaic, including both local-and landscape-level attributes characterized by gradient analysis (but see Blair 1996, Bolger et al 1997, Rottenborn 1999, Reynaud and Thioulouse 2000. In the present study, when we characterized the gradient to include mosaic composition, interesting community trends emerged.…”
Section: Declining Numbers Of Bird Species Along a Gradient Of Urbanimentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Earlier studies acknowledged landscapelevel effects (e.g., Emlen 1974, Vale and Vale 1976, Lancaster and Rees 1979, but the complexity of the urban mosaic itself was difficult to characterize. We know of only a few studies that have examined urban bird communities citywide at different spatial scales (Haddidian et al 1997, Reynaud andThioulouse 2000). Thus, we chose the spatial-structuring approach to examine avian community composition in relation to features of the entire urban matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a series of rectangular windows moving along the urban-rural gradient and sector windows moving around the urban centre were integrated with landscape pattern metrics to quantitatively characterize the urbanization pattern of the metropolitan area of Beijing, the capital of China. Gradient analysis, developed in the context of vegetation analysis (Whittaker 1975), has been used to investigate the effects of urbanization on plant distribution (e.g., Kowarik1990; Sukopp 1998) and ecosystem properties (McDonnell and Pickett 1990;Pouyat and McDonnell 1991;Pouyat et al 1995;Zhu and Carreiro 1999;Reynaud and Thioulouse 2000). Using the gradient analysis, Luck and Wu (2002) and Zhang (2004) analyzed the landscape pattern in the Phoenix and Shanghai metropolitan areas, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the opposing point of view, carnivorous [3,14] and insectivorous birds [3,12,15,[20][21][22] are considered at a disadvantage in highly urbanized areas, declining in both species richness and abundance. It is unclear if urban environments influence some other particular trophic group [4], because evidence shows that urban gradients in different cities may exert different effects in other trophic guilds [9,15,[23][24][25][26]. On the other hand, nesting patterns in breeding urban birds show two clear general trends: The most successful urban dwellers are characterized by i) showing cavity nesting behavior [3] and ii) building nests located a few meters above the ground or in the canopy [4,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%