Identification of common genomic regions controlling resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes, earliness and architectural traits in different pea genetic backgrounds

Fondevilla, Sara; Almeida, Nuno Felipe; Šatović, Zlatko; Rubiales, Diego; Patto, María Carlota Vaz; Cubero, J. I.; Torres, A. M.

doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0460-8

Cited by 48 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using a linkage map based on RAPD, SSR and STS marker polymorphism, ten and six QTLs associated with Ascochyta blight resistance at the seedling and adult plant stages, respectively, and four QTL independent of developmental stage were identified [160,162]. Three of these QTL were confirmed in a second RIL population [163].…”

Section: Markers For Disease and Pest Resistancementioning

confidence: 97%

“…pinodella and Ascochyta pisi [148]. Both single genes (Rap2) and QTLs have been reported conferring resistance to Ascochyta blight [157][158][159][160][161][162][163]. An early study with very few markers per linkage group identified single genes (Rmp1, Rmp2, Rmp3 and Rmp4) for M. pinodes resistance [158].…”

Section: Markers For Disease and Pest Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…An early study with very few markers per linkage group identified single genes (Rmp1, Rmp2, Rmp3 and Rmp4) for M. pinodes resistance [158]. A series of QTL studies have deepened our understanding of the quantitative inheritance of resistance to M. pinodes in pea [159][160][161][162][163]. Using a linkage map based on RAPD, SSR and STS marker polymorphism, ten and six QTLs associated with Ascochyta blight resistance at the seedling and adult plant stages, respectively, and four QTL independent of developmental stage were identified [160,162].…”

Section: Markers For Disease and Pest Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Genomic Era

Smýkal

Aubert²,

Burstin³

et al. 2012

Agronomy

Self Cite

201

158

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) was the original model organism used in Mendel's discovery (1866) of the laws of inheritance, making it the foundation of modern plant genetics. However, subsequent progress in pea genomics has lagged behind many other plant species. Although the size and repetitive nature of the pea genome has so far restricted its sequencing, comprehensive genomic and post genomic resources already exist. These include BAC libraries, several types of molecular marker sets, both transcriptome and proteome datasets and mutant populations for reverse genetics. The availability of the full genome sequences of three legume species has offered significant opportunities for genome wide comparison revealing synteny and co-linearity to pea. A combination of a candidate gene and colinearity approach has successfully led to the identification of genes underlying agronomically important traits including virus resistances and plant architecture. Some of this knowledge has already been applied to marker assisted selection (MAS) programs, increasing precision and shortening the breeding cycle. Yet, complete translation of marker discovery to pea breeding is still to be achieved. Molecular analysis of pea collections has shown that although substantial variation is present within the cultivated genepool, wild material offers the possibility to incorporate novel traits that may have been inadvertently eliminated. Association mapping analysis of diverse pea germplasm promises to identify genetic variation related to desirable agronomic traits, which are historically difficult to breed for in a traditional manner. The availability of high throughput 'omics' methodologies offers great promise for the development of novel, highly accurate selective breeding tools for improved pea genotypes that are sustainable under current and future climates and farming systems.

show abstract

Section: Markers For Disease and Pest Resistancementioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Markers For Disease and Pest Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Markers For Disease and Pest Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Genomic Era

Smýkal

Aubert²,

Burstin³

et al. 2012

Agronomy

Self Cite

201

158

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…abyssinicum, subsp. elatius and P. fulvum (Fondevilla et al, 2005(Fondevilla et al, , 2011Rubiales et al, 2005Rubiales et al, , 2009Barilli et al, 2009). Wild Pisum in its native range displays a typical winter habit in which plants germinate in autumn, overwinter in the vegetative state, and flower in response to increasing day-length in spring (Abbo et al, 2003;Weller et al, 2009Weller et al, , 2012.…”

Section: Crop Pea (Pisum Sativum L)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding

Smýkal

Coyne

Ambrose

et al. 2014

Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

273

189

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The first maps in legumes were done with morphological markers, isozymes and a few DNA markers containing mainly anonymous, low reproducible markers such as RAPDs or RFLPs (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) (Torres et al, 1993;Simon and Muehlbauer, 1997;Weeden et al, 1998;Chowdhury and Slinkard, 1999;Rubeena et al, 2003). The use of more reproducible molecular markers such as SSRs (Simple Sequence Repeats) is increasing the quality of the maps and allowing comparison between maps (Pozarkova et al, 2002;Loridon et al, 2005;Millán et al, 2010;Fondevilla et al, 2011a;Yang et al, 2012). Some of the mapped SSRs are located within genes but there is still a need for increasing the saturation of the existing legumes maps with gene-based markers.…”

Section: B Advances and Challenges For Marker-assistedmentioning

confidence: 99%