2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of development areas in a warming Arctic with respect to natural resources, transportation, protected areas, and geography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Valsson and Ulfarsson (2009) highlighted Iceland's position and potential changes in its geopolitical meaning if, for example, two new global transportation circles were formed through the Arctic Ocean with Iceland in the middle. Elíasson et al (2017) employed GIS data to evaluate the potential risks and benefits linked to resource use and exploitation in the Arctic waters shared by Iceland. Although many Icelanders are enthusiastic about the economic potential of increased Arctic ship traffic and resource exploitation, little research to date has provided concrete data that argue in support of the benefits that could accrue specifically to Iceland, in part because it is difficult to quantify potential future events ( Larsen and Huskey, 2015 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Valsson and Ulfarsson (2009) highlighted Iceland's position and potential changes in its geopolitical meaning if, for example, two new global transportation circles were formed through the Arctic Ocean with Iceland in the middle. Elíasson et al (2017) employed GIS data to evaluate the potential risks and benefits linked to resource use and exploitation in the Arctic waters shared by Iceland. Although many Icelanders are enthusiastic about the economic potential of increased Arctic ship traffic and resource exploitation, little research to date has provided concrete data that argue in support of the benefits that could accrue specifically to Iceland, in part because it is difficult to quantify potential future events ( Larsen and Huskey, 2015 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iceland is a lightly populated country (about 342,000) facing significant challenges in the global economy, highly dependent on tourism and with a rapidly changing natural environment ( Cela, 2013 ). What role will potential oil and gas exploration play in the country's future development strategies, especially considering its stance on environmentally sustainable practices ( Elíasson et al, 2017 ; Holthus et al, 2013 ). New research is needed on resource exploitation in Iceland and how often-contradictory energy and environmental policies can be reconciled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The melting sea ice and opening of new resources for extraction [ 88 ] increase the risk for environmental accidents and are likely to increase land-use competition limiting the possibilities for Saami to adapt to the climate change and possibilities to maintain their traditional livelihoods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolitically, the EU’s Arctic policy shifted to the Barents, where it is institutionally more robust settled and where Denmark and Iceland play a minor role. Economically, the Barents is the most promising Arctic sub-region: Sweden and Finland are rich in mineral resources, including rare-earths, and the Barents is rich in proteins, and also for decades to come the most promising route for trans-Arctic shipping as part of the NSR, as new research suggests (Eliasson et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Critical Junctures Crossovers and Geographic Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%