2016
DOI: 10.4149/neo_2016_007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of driver pathways in cancer based on combinatorial patterns of somatic gene mutations

Abstract: With the availability of high-throughput technologies, a huge number of biological data (e.g., somatic mutation, DNA methylation and gene expression) in multiple cancers have been generated. A major challenge is to identify functional and vital driver mutation import for the initiation and progression of cancer. In this paper, we introduce a novel method, named Co-occurring mutated metagene Genetic Algorithm (CoGA), to solve the maximum weight submatrix problem, with the aim of distinguishing mutated driver pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of these cost functions, optimal sub-networks are identified and interpreted as novel cancer driver pathways 22 24 . However, at the moment there is no consensual method to rigorously define a mathematical metric for mutual exclusivity and compute its statistical significance, and a number of interpretations exist 22 , 23 , 25 – 27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these cost functions, optimal sub-networks are identified and interpreted as novel cancer driver pathways 22 24 . However, at the moment there is no consensual method to rigorously define a mathematical metric for mutual exclusivity and compute its statistical significance, and a number of interpretations exist 22 , 23 , 25 – 27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these cost functions, optimal sub-networks are identified and interpreted as novel cancer driver pathways [22][23][24] . However, at the moment there is no consensual method to rigorously define a mathematical metric for mutual exclusivity and compute its statistical significance, and a number of interpretations exist 22,23,[25][26][27] .…”
Section: Problem Definition and Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Three papers [33,46,51] used Genomic Variation data as a single source of feature, whereas 23 (i.e., 56.09%) used it in combination with other categories. A long-standing hypothesis in the discovery of cancer drivers is that driver genes are mutated more frequently than expected as compared to a background mutation rate (BMR) estimated from cancer samples for a given cancer type [11].…”
Section: Genomic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation hotspots were also detected using scores computed by OncoDriveCLUST [26,59,64] and applying density estimates to aggregate closelyspaced missense mutations into peaks and compute mutation fraction inside the highest peak [53]. The normalized number of SNPs in the exon where the mutation is located [24], mutations' distance to closest Transcribed Sequence Start (TSS) and closest Transcribed Sequence End (TSE) [43], and a genelevel binary matrix summarizing mutation occurrence across all samples [33,51] were also adopted.…”
Section: Genomic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation