2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of future fields of standardisation: An explorative application of the Delphi methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Delphi methodology engages stakeholders to provide personal judgment and opinion about a topic, using methods that promote balanced viewpoint, anonymity, iteration, structured feedback and aggregation of group response to arrive at a consensus (Skulmoski, Hartman, & Krahn, 2007). Participants in Delphi studies engage in multiple rounds of thoughtfully designed questionnaires (Goluchowicz & Blind, 2011;Okoli & Pawlowski, 2004). After each round, the responses from the group are collated and interpreted, and the participants are provided with summarized information to communicate various stakeholder positions (Balasubramanian & Agarwal, 2012;Okoli & Pawlowski, 2004).…”
Section: Electronic Delphi (Edelphi) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi methodology engages stakeholders to provide personal judgment and opinion about a topic, using methods that promote balanced viewpoint, anonymity, iteration, structured feedback and aggregation of group response to arrive at a consensus (Skulmoski, Hartman, & Krahn, 2007). Participants in Delphi studies engage in multiple rounds of thoughtfully designed questionnaires (Goluchowicz & Blind, 2011;Okoli & Pawlowski, 2004). After each round, the responses from the group are collated and interpreted, and the participants are provided with summarized information to communicate various stakeholder positions (Balasubramanian & Agarwal, 2012;Okoli & Pawlowski, 2004).…”
Section: Electronic Delphi (Edelphi) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of the current polar bear research is related to population ecology studies (e.g., Vongraven et al, 2012), and the generated list of indicators important for health closely aligns with data collected for those studies. It is possible that these data best reflect polar bear health, but it is also important to consider that the results of a Delphi exercise inherently reflect the specialties represented on the panel (Goluchowicz and Blind, 2011;Hus and Sandford, 2007). In this study, the expert group included polar bear biologists studying primarily at the population-level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este método se escogió por su capacidad para estructurar y organizar la comunicación grupal, siendo útil en la búsqueda de precisión en el marco de un acuerdo grupal sobre ciertos temas (Goluchowicz & Blind, 2011). Además, es una herramienta que, siendo bien utilizada, da resolución a problemas a través de un enfoque democrático y estructurado que aprovecha la sabiduría colectiva de quienes participan en él (Powell, 2002).…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified