2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of novel genes involved in DNA damage response by screening a genome-wide Schizosaccharomyces pombe deletion library

Abstract: BackgroundDNA damage response (DDR) plays pivotal roles in maintaining genome integrity and stability. An effective DDR requires the involvement of hundreds of genes that compose a complicated network. Because DDR is highly conserved in evolution, studies in lower eukaryotes can provide valuable information to elucidate the mechanism in higher organisms. Fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) has emerged as an excellent model for DDR research in recent years. To identify novel genes involved in DDR, we scre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, resistance may be a consequence of mutant cell aggregation, rather than inhibition of the peptide’s ability to electrostatically engage the surface glycans of individual yeast cells. We tested this possibility by evaluating the SVS-1 sensitivity of different deletion mutants selected for their known potential to readily flocculate (Dekker et al, 2004; Drewes and Nurse, 2003; Kim et al, 2001; Linder et al, 2008; Pan et al, 2012; Prevorovsky et al, 2009; Watson and Davey, 1998). All of these mutants were sensitive to the SVS-1 peptide (Figure S3B), indicating that flocculation propensity alone does not confer resistance to yeast.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, resistance may be a consequence of mutant cell aggregation, rather than inhibition of the peptide’s ability to electrostatically engage the surface glycans of individual yeast cells. We tested this possibility by evaluating the SVS-1 sensitivity of different deletion mutants selected for their known potential to readily flocculate (Dekker et al, 2004; Drewes and Nurse, 2003; Kim et al, 2001; Linder et al, 2008; Pan et al, 2012; Prevorovsky et al, 2009; Watson and Davey, 1998). All of these mutants were sensitive to the SVS-1 peptide (Figure S3B), indicating that flocculation propensity alone does not confer resistance to yeast.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a genome-wide screen of genes involved in the DNA damage response, we previously found that spt20D cells exhibited a peak of 4C DNA content in a flow cytometry analysis (Pan et al, 2012). Duplication of DNA content could be caused by DNA rereplication, defect in cytokinesis or cell separation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caffeine and torin1 clearly increased sensitivity to phleomycin in gaf1Δ mutants, suggesting this effect occurs independently of Gaf1. Rapamycin could enhance sensitivity to the tco89Δ mutant which displays enhanced sensitivity to the drug and other genotoxins (Nakashima et al, 2012, Pan et al, 2012. This activity was not associated with DNA damage checkpoint override.…”
Section: Torc1 Inhibition Overrides Dna Damage Checkpoint Signallingmentioning
confidence: 99%