1985
DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(85)90156-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of skull from its suture pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The wormian bone were more in male (4.1%) than in (3.6%) in present study, whereas most of the previous study, Berry AC et al (1974) 2 , Chandersekharan P (1985) 4 , are silent about sex variation in wormian bone. Bhagwat SS et al (1984) 3 in their study in Gujarat have also found no sex difference in incidence of wormian bone.…”
Section: Observation and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The wormian bone were more in male (4.1%) than in (3.6%) in present study, whereas most of the previous study, Berry AC et al (1974) 2 , Chandersekharan P (1985) 4 , are silent about sex variation in wormian bone. Bhagwat SS et al (1984) 3 in their study in Gujarat have also found no sex difference in incidence of wormian bone.…”
Section: Observation and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…4.7% than the previous study of Berry AC et al (1974) 2 who have reported it in 4.6% of cases. Chandersekharan P (1985) 4 has reported 20% incidence of wormian bone in south-India.…”
Section: Observation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While particular characteristics like an osseous mandibular cyst (2) found in an X-ray are employed in the specific method, the scientific method is a data based approach focus sing on the variations in the configurations of the skeletal elements (1). Radiographically recorded bony traits employed for individualising skulls in the latter method include the structural variations in the sphenoid bone (1), the pattern of frontal sinus and the mastoid process (3) and the suture patterns (4,5). It is proposed in this paper, that the contour configuration of wormian bone, an epigenetic marker, whensoever seen in an antemortem radiograph can provide positive proof while identifying a skull.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%