2021
DOI: 10.3390/app112311503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the Importance of Criteria for Passenger Choice of Sustainable Travel by Train Using ARTIW and IHAMCI Methods

Abstract: Nowadays, travelers can use different modes of transport, and they usually choose the most suitable and reliable mode available. The choice of one mode of transport as an alternative to another is subjective. It is usually built upon passenger attitude toward the advantages and disadvantages of using a particular mode. This article proposes analytical methods for and research results on passenger choices for sustainable train journeys as an alternative to traveling by bus. The rank averages of all criteria and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During log transportation, forces affect both the load and the vehicle. These are usually seen as separate elements, and their priority and the complexity of their interactions are disregarded [40]. Twelve experts participated in the expert evaluation, assessing the impact of the forces (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During log transportation, forces affect both the load and the vehicle. These are usually seen as separate elements, and their priority and the complexity of their interactions are disregarded [40]. Twelve experts participated in the expert evaluation, assessing the impact of the forces (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the rank correlation method presented by Kendall [43] was used. From the ranks of the studied criteria, applying new average rank transformation into weights linear and non-linear (average rank transformation into weight-linear-ARTIW-L and average rank transformation into weight-non-linear-ARTIW-N) methods [44], the normalized criteria weights were calculated. The experts also provided percentage importance estimates for the criteria, which were used to calculate all the normalized weights of their subjects using the direct percentage weight (DPW) method.…”
Section: Criteria Significance Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calculating Kendall's concordance coefficient, expert evaluations were rated, i.e., assigning a score of 1 for the most important indicator and the score of m-for the least important last indicator. All calculations were performed according to the methodology provided in [56,57].…”
Section: Selecting the Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%