2006
DOI: 10.1177/0092070305284969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology

Abstract: Many scholars across various academic disciplines are investigating the following questions: What do individuals know or believe about an organization? How does a focal organization (and/or other interested entity) develop, use, and/or change this information? and How do individuals respond to what they know or believe about an organization? Cross-disciplinary research that centers on these questions is desirable and could be enhanced if researchers identify and develop consistent terminology for framing these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
616
0
44

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 711 publications
(670 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
616
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize broadly, the concept of organizational identity takes on different meanings in sociological and psychological research; sociologists often use the label to refer to how external audiences view an organization, whereas psychologists tend to use it to refer to how internal members view the organization (for a review and distinctions between "identity," "image," and "reputation," see Brown et al 2006). While these two views often agree, sometimes they do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize broadly, the concept of organizational identity takes on different meanings in sociological and psychological research; sociologists often use the label to refer to how external audiences view an organization, whereas psychologists tend to use it to refer to how internal members view the organization (for a review and distinctions between "identity," "image," and "reputation," see Brown et al 2006). While these two views often agree, sometimes they do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we adopt a holistic perspective of the brand, which covers consumers' perceived utilitarian, as well as more hedonic, or symbolic aspects of brands. To illustrate, Brown et al (2006) define a 'brand' as the "totality of all stakeholders' mental associations about the organization" and related objects (e.g. the website; Stern 2006).…”
Section: Cbe Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não está no escopo deste trabalho discutir a relação entre cultura e identidade organizacional. Entretanto, defende-se que a identidade organizacional -a forma como os membros internos realmente pensam as características da organização (Brown, Dacin & Pratt, 2006) -é determinada pela cultura organizacional.…”
Section: •Identidade Organizacionalunclassified