2021
DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2021.1946018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Im)mobility at the margins: low-income households’ experiences of peripheral resettlement in India and South Africa

Abstract: Expanded state-subsidised housing programmes in middle-income countries raise questions about the displacement and socio-spatial marginalisation of poor households. Examining these questions through people's experiences of resettlement indicates the importance of mobility to their lives. Drawing on a mixed-method comparative study of Ahmedabad, Chennai and Johannesburg, we ask: How does the relocation of low-income households to urban peripheries reshape the links between their physical and socio-economic mobi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
11

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
27
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Such works offer insights into the incremental and informal processes of urban expansion (Aguilar, 2008; Aguilar & Guerrero, 2013; Allen et al., 2017; Zhu & Guo, 2014) and highlight the conflict between the wishful thinking of planned residential growth and infrastructure development versus unplanned informal developments and existing infrastructure deficits (Follmann et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2013). The rise of middle‐class communities (Bartels, 2020; Dupont, 2016; Mercer, 2020; Webster et al., 2014) and state‐led housing projects – like Minha Casa Minha Vida Entidades in Brazil (Libertun de Duren, 2018; Stiphany & Ward, 2019), resettlement colonies in India, and state‐sponsored housing in South Africa (Williams et al., 2021) – foster an extremely heterogeneous population composition and “heterogenous infrastructure configurations” (Lawhon et al., 2018) in peri‐urban areas. Thus, while early research on the geographies of peri‐urbanization in the global south generally equated geographic peripherality with poverty and marginality (see, e.g., Allen, 2003; Mbiba & Huchzermeyer, 2002; Simon et al., 2004), more recent research has challenged this view by increasingly investigating the middle class' role in the transformation of the urban periphery (Bartels, 2020; Dupont, 2016; Mercer, 2020; Webster et al., 2014) and the emergence of new centers of economic power paired with large‐scale infrastructure investments in the urban periphery (Kanai & Schindler, 2019; Schindler & Kanai, 2021; van Noorloos & Kloosterboer, 2018).…”
Section: Defining the Peri‐urban: State Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such works offer insights into the incremental and informal processes of urban expansion (Aguilar, 2008; Aguilar & Guerrero, 2013; Allen et al., 2017; Zhu & Guo, 2014) and highlight the conflict between the wishful thinking of planned residential growth and infrastructure development versus unplanned informal developments and existing infrastructure deficits (Follmann et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2013). The rise of middle‐class communities (Bartels, 2020; Dupont, 2016; Mercer, 2020; Webster et al., 2014) and state‐led housing projects – like Minha Casa Minha Vida Entidades in Brazil (Libertun de Duren, 2018; Stiphany & Ward, 2019), resettlement colonies in India, and state‐sponsored housing in South Africa (Williams et al., 2021) – foster an extremely heterogeneous population composition and “heterogenous infrastructure configurations” (Lawhon et al., 2018) in peri‐urban areas. Thus, while early research on the geographies of peri‐urbanization in the global south generally equated geographic peripherality with poverty and marginality (see, e.g., Allen, 2003; Mbiba & Huchzermeyer, 2002; Simon et al., 2004), more recent research has challenged this view by increasingly investigating the middle class' role in the transformation of the urban periphery (Bartels, 2020; Dupont, 2016; Mercer, 2020; Webster et al., 2014) and the emergence of new centers of economic power paired with large‐scale infrastructure investments in the urban periphery (Kanai & Schindler, 2019; Schindler & Kanai, 2021; van Noorloos & Kloosterboer, 2018).…”
Section: Defining the Peri‐urban: State Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have critically assessed the outcomes -typically private developer-led slum redevelopment projects or state-built mass tenements on urban peripheries. They have highlighted the poor quality of design, construction and services in these projects, their ghetto character and the disruptive effects of relocation on the livelihoods of residents, analysing how these effects have exacerbated the vulnerabilities of the urban poor and engendered new geographies of segregation, disconnection and risk in metropolitan India (Coelho, 2016;Desai et al, 2020;Doshi, 2013;Williams et al, 2021). Scholarship on peripheral urbanisation in India has yet to contend fully with the (mostly hidden) presence of large state-built slum-resettlement colonies in metropolitan peripheries across the country (cf.…”
Section: Urban Poverty and The 'Problem Of Slums'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the state has a role in reshaping the relationship between the physical and socioeconomic mobility of the relocated community. It will be challenges, the direct ability of individual communities to move and the long-term social mobility of their households [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, according to the floor area of the widest house, average household in DKI Jakarta has a floor area of 20-49 m 2 (35,55%) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%