“…Such works offer insights into the incremental and informal processes of urban expansion (Aguilar, 2008; Aguilar & Guerrero, 2013; Allen et al., 2017; Zhu & Guo, 2014) and highlight the conflict between the wishful thinking of planned residential growth and infrastructure development versus unplanned informal developments and existing infrastructure deficits (Follmann et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2013). The rise of middle‐class communities (Bartels, 2020; Dupont, 2016; Mercer, 2020; Webster et al., 2014) and state‐led housing projects – like Minha Casa Minha Vida Entidades in Brazil (Libertun de Duren, 2018; Stiphany & Ward, 2019), resettlement colonies in India, and state‐sponsored housing in South Africa (Williams et al., 2021) – foster an extremely heterogeneous population composition and “heterogenous infrastructure configurations” (Lawhon et al., 2018) in peri‐urban areas. Thus, while early research on the geographies of peri‐urbanization in the global south generally equated geographic peripherality with poverty and marginality (see, e.g., Allen, 2003; Mbiba & Huchzermeyer, 2002; Simon et al., 2004), more recent research has challenged this view by increasingly investigating the middle class' role in the transformation of the urban periphery (Bartels, 2020; Dupont, 2016; Mercer, 2020; Webster et al., 2014) and the emergence of new centers of economic power paired with large‐scale infrastructure investments in the urban periphery (Kanai & Schindler, 2019; Schindler & Kanai, 2021; van Noorloos & Kloosterboer, 2018).…”