1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00026-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
227
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(122 reference statements)
14
227
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical difference between the three tasks in Experiment 2 was that the base shape delimited a negative space in the hole-fitting task and a positive space in the tower and formfitting tasks. Besides, we have seen that it is easier to work with familiar objects presented in the same way than with objects that look different (Rudge and Warrington 1991;Skouteris, McKenzie et al 1992;Tarr and Bülthoff 1995;Tarr and Bülthoff 1998). While in the tower condition the two objects were copies of one another, the other tasks had objects that required a rendering of a 3D object to a 2D display.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The critical difference between the three tasks in Experiment 2 was that the base shape delimited a negative space in the hole-fitting task and a positive space in the tower and formfitting tasks. Besides, we have seen that it is easier to work with familiar objects presented in the same way than with objects that look different (Rudge and Warrington 1991;Skouteris, McKenzie et al 1992;Tarr and Bülthoff 1995;Tarr and Bülthoff 1998). While in the tower condition the two objects were copies of one another, the other tasks had objects that required a rendering of a 3D object to a 2D display.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most likely, this has to do with the fact that it is not the whole 3D object that is represented by the aperture, but just one of its cross-sections. The children see the object from above showing its short side, they might relate it to the aperture that shows a matching silhouette from the viewpoint parallel to the object's major axis (Rock 1974;Tarr and Bülthoff 1995;Tarr and Bülthoff 1998). If the object is lying down, the children get quite a different picture than the opening of the aperture, and will most likely produce a worse result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations