2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00745.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of offset VSP data acquired in complex areas with modified reverse‐time migration

Abstract: A B S T R A C TA modified reverse-time migration algorithm for offset vertical seismic profiling data is proposed. This algorithm performs depth imaging of target areas in the borehole vicinity without taking into account the overburden. Originally recorded seismograms are used; reliable results can be obtained using only the velocity profile obtained along the well. The downgoing wavefield emitted from a surface source is approximated in the target area using the transmitted P-wave, recorded by the receivers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, to provide richer and more effective information for a better understanding of the geological characteristics between wells, the researchers derived the first-order velocity-stress elastic wave equation of longitudinal and transverse wave decoupling based on an inhomogeneous medium and obtained 2D cross-hole longitudinal and shear wave imaging sections [38]. However, current research is limited to 2D cross-hole RTM imaging and does not utilize information from multiple wells, so it is impossible to obtain the entire 3D geological structure [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, to provide richer and more effective information for a better understanding of the geological characteristics between wells, the researchers derived the first-order velocity-stress elastic wave equation of longitudinal and transverse wave decoupling based on an inhomogeneous medium and obtained 2D cross-hole longitudinal and shear wave imaging sections [38]. However, current research is limited to 2D cross-hole RTM imaging and does not utilize information from multiple wells, so it is impossible to obtain the entire 3D geological structure [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each wavefield component contributes to the final image to varying degrees, especially the primaries and surface‐related multiples. Conventional imaging methods for VSP data mostly rely on the upgoing primary‐only wavefield, which is a natural application of primary migration method from SSP to VSP data, for instance, Kirchhoff migration (Keho, 1984; Wiggins, 1984; Dillon, 1988; Gherasim et al ., 2005; Lou and Simpson, 2019), reverse time migration (Chang and Mcmechan, 1986; Xiao and Leaney, 2010; Du et al ., 2018), interferometric migration (Hornby and Yu, 2006; He et al ., 2008; Xiao and Schuster, 2008; Neklyudov and Borodin, 2009) and Gaussian beam migration (Protasov and Tcheverda, 2012). These types of VSP migration methods mainly consider imaging the upgoing primary reflections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, due to the fast development of computer technology and increasing demand of accurate imaging for a complex structure reservoir, RTM has regained attention in the seismic community. RTM has been developed from post‐stack to prestack migration, from 2D to 3D migration (McMechan 1990), from acoustic to elastic wave equation migration (Chang and McMechan 1994) and from streamer data to VSP data migration (Neklyudov and Borodin 2009); from isotropic to tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media migration (Zhang, Rector and Hoversten 2005; Du, Bancroft and Lines 2007; Fletcher, Du and Fowler 2009; Duveneck and Bakker 2011; Zhang, Zhang and Zhang 2011). But like any other imaging methods, RTM does have some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%