2012
DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2011.618489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagining ‘radical’ youth work possibilities – challenging the ‘symbolic violence’ within the mainstream tradition in contemporary state-led youth work practice in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, much of current youth policy since Youth Matters (2005) says little about young people's sexuality, other than in very general terms and when it does refer to it sexual identity, behaviour and expression are frequently conflated with sexual health and wellbeing (Carabine 1996b). Cooper (2012) has argued that contemporary youth work practice constitutes a form of symbolic violence insofar as it limits the possibilities for some young people and masks the material inequalities and structural barriers that prevent disadvantaged young people from inventing their adulthoods. Drawing on Davies (2010) and Batsleer (2010), Cooper (2012, p. 55) posits that 'what is crucial is not so much the policy, but the practice' of contemporary youth work.…”
Section: Tensions Contradictions and Convergence Between Policy And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much of current youth policy since Youth Matters (2005) says little about young people's sexuality, other than in very general terms and when it does refer to it sexual identity, behaviour and expression are frequently conflated with sexual health and wellbeing (Carabine 1996b). Cooper (2012) has argued that contemporary youth work practice constitutes a form of symbolic violence insofar as it limits the possibilities for some young people and masks the material inequalities and structural barriers that prevent disadvantaged young people from inventing their adulthoods. Drawing on Davies (2010) and Batsleer (2010), Cooper (2012, p. 55) posits that 'what is crucial is not so much the policy, but the practice' of contemporary youth work.…”
Section: Tensions Contradictions and Convergence Between Policy And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Rossi and his colleagues (2004) stated, there are hardly any social problems that can be easily and convincingly described in terms of simple and unambiguous characteristics of the individuals experiencing those problems. Therefore, the first implication for SFD stakeholders designing and researching SFD programs is to pay more attention to the needs assessment of young people by starting with an open-ended bottomup approach that is tailored to the actual life situations of young people and their individual differences, instead of relying on pre-defined, abstract ideas (Cooper, 2012;Giulianotti, Hognestad, & Spaaij, 2016;Haudenhuyse et al, 2012b;Haudenhuyse, Theeboom, & Coalter, 2012a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, outside of SFD, in other youth development contexts, the concept of self-esteem, for instance, has become a 'household word' on the assumption that boosting it will by itself foster positive outcomes, although evidence for such an assumption has not been found (Baumeister, Campbell, Krueger, & Vohs, 2003;Mruk, 2013). Unfortunately, a large number of SFD practitioners and scholars within sport-based youth development contexts find it difficult to resist thinking in terms of a deficit model, thereby aligning themselves with the dominant managerialist or political rhetoric, and potentially harming young people and their self-image (Cooper, 2012;Kennelly, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Socially responsible generation There is evidence to show that the introduction of the NCS has led to a new market for youth service providers which have resulted in spaces for critical youth work practice becoming more problematic (Cooper, 2012). In the context of the current political and economic climate it can be argued that the NCS has nurtured a form of youth work practice which 'imposes constraints and raises contradictions; complicating the delivery of services, at the same time as diminishing the rewards of inspired practice at all levels' (Mason, 2015, p19).…”
Section: Desired Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is indicative of a youth policy which seeks to construct a youth sector based upon a 'payments-by results' delivery model. Cooper (2012) suggests that the current national youth policy framework is 'closing off opportunities for progressive ways of working with young people ' (2012, p6). The concern about a neocommunitarian approach is that it fosters compliance with a form of practice which offers The recent NCS commissioning process indicates that this neo-communitarian trend has been accelerated and is indicative of how neo-liberalism and market logics have encroached into the social action field.…”
Section: Neo-communitarian Model: Marketisation Of Youth Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%