2019
DOI: 10.1002/we.2337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of aerodynamic modeling on seakeeping performance of a floating horizontal axis wind turbine

Abstract: Over the last decade, several coupled simulation tools have been developed in order to design and optimize floating wind turbines (FWTs). In most of these tools, the aerodynamic modeling is based on quasi‐steady aerodynamic models such as the blade element momentum (BEM). It may not be accurate enough for FWTs as the motion of the platform induces highly unsteady phenomena around the rotor. To address this issue, a new design tool has been developed coupling a seakeeping solver with an unsteady aerodynamic sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the wave-structure interaction point of view, the horizontal side-to-side motions of an FOWT can be divided primarily into two groups, i.e. those in the wave frequencies and those at the natural frequencies of the sway or the roll motion (Jonkman & Musial 2010;Robertson et al 2014;Leroy et al 2019). For this reason, the present work selects a rather large frequency range to analyse the influence of different motions from both groups, as shown in table 2.…”
Section: Side-to-side Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the wave-structure interaction point of view, the horizontal side-to-side motions of an FOWT can be divided primarily into two groups, i.e. those in the wave frequencies and those at the natural frequencies of the sway or the roll motion (Jonkman & Musial 2010;Robertson et al 2014;Leroy et al 2019). For this reason, the present work selects a rather large frequency range to analyse the influence of different motions from both groups, as shown in table 2.…”
Section: Side-to-side Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They however noted the advantages of using FVW models to study dynamic inflow as it provides access to the induced velocities along the blade, as opposed to blade‐resolved CFD where these values are more complicated to obtain. The surge motion of a wind turbine on a floater as an oscillating motion has been previously studied with an actuator disk method by de Vaal et al 14 and with the FVW method by Leroy et al 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They however noted the advantages of using FVW models to study dynamic inflow as it provides access to the induced velocities along the blade, as opposed to blade-resolved CFD where these values are more complicated to obtain. The surge motion of a wind turbine on a floater as an oscillating motion has been previously studied with an actuator disk method by de Vaal et al 14 and with the FVW method by Leroy et al 15 An experimental analysis of the dynamic inflow effect was done in the NREL Phase VI project. 16,17 Measurements were done at five different radial positions along the blade, giving some insight into the radial behavior of the dynamic inflow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study has been done following the same methodology on a floating HAWT in Leroy et al. The study here compares PVW and FVW unsteady aerodynamic solvers with a state‐of‐the‐art blade element momentum quasi‐steady aerodynamic solver.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%