2005
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection for Breast Cancer

Abstract: Breast density does not impact overall CAD detection of breast cancer. There is no statistically significant difference in breast cancer detection in dense and nondense breasts. However, the detection of breast cancer manifesting as masses is impacted by breast density. The false-positive rate is lower in nondense versus dense breasts. CAD may be particularly advantageous in patients with dense breasts, in which mammography is most challenging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
4
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
52
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it is an imperfect exam, with many agreeing that this test has a sensitivity of about 85 to 90% (4,5). In order to improve the effectiveness of this method, systems for computer aided diagnosis (CAD) are arising and according to several authors this is leading to an incremental improvement of detection for this type of cancer by coordinating the work of the radiologist with the implementation of the CAD system (1,4,6).…”
Section: Framing the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, it is an imperfect exam, with many agreeing that this test has a sensitivity of about 85 to 90% (4,5). In order to improve the effectiveness of this method, systems for computer aided diagnosis (CAD) are arising and according to several authors this is leading to an incremental improvement of detection for this type of cancer by coordinating the work of the radiologist with the implementation of the CAD system (1,4,6).…”
Section: Framing the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when cancer cells are found in the lymph nodes of the breast there is a high probability that these spread to the bloodstream and consequently create metastases elsewhere in the body (3,5,16).…”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FROC curves with the FP marker rates obtained from the normal data set were compared. [52][53][54] because it reflects how the CAD system performs in terms of specificity and whether the CAD system may cause extra efforts for radiologists to double check the marked locations or unnecessary recalls in a screening setting. Furthermore, for CAD systems that set a maximum number of detected objects at the output, estimating the number of FPs using images with lesions can potentially lead to an optimistic bias for the FROC curve because one of the detected objects will likely be the true lesion.…”
Section: Fig 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that the performance of mammographic ComputerAided Detection systems decreases as the density of the breast increases, either decreasing the sensitivity [1,2] or increasing the specificity [3]. Thus, the segmentation of breast density is beneficial not only for estimating the quantity of breast dense tissue, but also for establishing specific abnormalities detection procedures according to the type of tissue (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%