2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-0433-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of clinical data on chest radiography sensitivity in detecting pulmonary abnormalities in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia

Abstract: The sensitivity of CXR is too low to consider it a stand-alone technique for the evaluation of immunocompromised patients after HSCT with suspected pneumonia, even if the radiologist knows detailed clinical data. For these patients, an early chest CT evaluation is therefore recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Computed tomography (CT) is often preferred because of the low sensitivity of chest X-rays in this population (6,7). Although nonspecific, abnormal parenchymal patterns such as airspace consolidation, ground glass opacities, nodules, and reticular changes (8) may help inform the differential diagnosis and guide the next step in clinical decision-making (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) is often preferred because of the low sensitivity of chest X-rays in this population (6,7). Although nonspecific, abnormal parenchymal patterns such as airspace consolidation, ground glass opacities, nodules, and reticular changes (8) may help inform the differential diagnosis and guide the next step in clinical decision-making (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms are often nonspecific and include rapidly developing dyspnoea and a dry, unproductive cough [3,5]. The radiography and CT appearance of the various forms of DR-ILD have been variously described in the literature [7,8]. CT enables precise assessment of the presence, pattern and distribution of parenchymal and airway abnormalities and has higher sensitivity compared with chest radiography, which may be normal in the early stages of DR-ILD [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiography and CT appearance of the various forms of DR-ILD have been variously described in the literature [7,8]. CT enables precise assessment of the presence, pattern and distribution of parenchymal and airway abnormalities and has higher sensitivity compared with chest radiography, which may be normal in the early stages of DR-ILD [8]. The radiological manifestations of DR-ILD correspond to the underlying histological findings: nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), hypersensitivity pneumonia (HP), pulmonary oedema, (n=13); organizing pneumonia (OP) (n=9); hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) (n=2); alveolar haemorrage (AH) (n=2); non specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (n=5); lipoid pneumonia (LP) (n=1); sarcoid-like pattern (n=1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations