2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/btas.2016.7791177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of environmental factors on biometric matching during human decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bolme et al [4] tracked biometric capabilities of face, fingerprint and iris during human decomposition in outdoor conditions. Twelve subjects were placed in a body farm to assess how the environment and time affect performance of biometric methods.…”
Section: Review Of Post-mortem Iris Recognition Efforts To Date Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bolme et al [4] tracked biometric capabilities of face, fingerprint and iris during human decomposition in outdoor conditions. Twelve subjects were placed in a body farm to assess how the environment and time affect performance of biometric methods.…”
Section: Review Of Post-mortem Iris Recognition Efforts To Date Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies demonstrate that the dynamics of eye and iris decomposition, from the biometric point of view, are more complex and less rapid than initially believed. These processes heavily depend on the ambient conditions, but today we know that iris patterns can still be useful for recognition a few days after death in a warm environment [4], [5], or up to even a few weeks in a mortuary environment [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study tracking biometric capabilities of both the typically used forensic modalities, namely fingerprints and faces, as well as iris is presented by Bolme et al [5]. The authors placed twelve deceased subjects in outdoor conditions to assess how the environment and time affect the biometric performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difficulties in data collection and the obvious unpleasantness of such experiments, very little research has been published, especially when human eyes are concerned, with few exceptions, namely (A. Sansola, 2015) (the paper concludes that post-mortem iris recognition works fine in about 80% of the cases for samples acquired up to 2 days after death) and (Bolme et al, 2016) (which mostly focuses on post-mortem face and fingerprint recognition, with few conclusions regarding irises). (Saripalle et al, 2015) present a study of post-mortem iris recognition using cadaver eyes of a domestic pig, reporting that the eyes lose their capability to serve as a biometric identifier in 6 to 8 hours post-mortem.…”
Section: Post-mortem Iris Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%