2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06238-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of environmental variables on the efficiency of water companies in England and Wales: a double-bootstrap approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the English and Welsh water industry improved considerably during the 2006-2010 period. Regulatory incentives might positively impact efficiency, such as sharing any outperformance in expenditure with customers and financial rewards and penalties when network quality improves (Villegas et al, 2019). The efficiency of WaSCs substantially improved (from 0.439 to 0.517, on average), whereas the mean efficiency of WoCs increased slightly (from 0.508 to 0.537).…”
Section: Efficiency Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of the English and Welsh water industry improved considerably during the 2006-2010 period. Regulatory incentives might positively impact efficiency, such as sharing any outperformance in expenditure with customers and financial rewards and penalties when network quality improves (Villegas et al, 2019). The efficiency of WaSCs substantially improved (from 0.439 to 0.517, on average), whereas the mean efficiency of WoCs increased slightly (from 0.508 to 0.537).…”
Section: Efficiency Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…order-m (Simar and Wilson, 2007;Ferreira and Marques, 2017). However, it is challenging to select the number of bootstrap replications and optimal number of m (Villegas et al, 2019). Consequently, Esteve et al (2020Esteve et al ( , 2021a developed a new technique, called Efficiency Analysis Trees (EAT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we selected the following variables which were based on topography, water treatment complexity and density [41,[66][67][68]. The variables used to capture topography included: (i) the water taken from boreholes measured in percentage [10,60,69]; (ii) the water taken from rivers measured in percentage [10,41,70], (iii) average pumping head as a proxy for the energy requirements to supply water to end-users [10,41,60]. We included two variables to capture treatment complexity: (iv) the water that gets advanced treatment measured in percentage (for more details please see [66][67][68]71] and (v) the number of treatment works required to treat water that comes from surface [41,71,72].…”
Section: Case Study Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included two variables to capture treatment complexity: (iv) the water that gets advanced treatment measured in percentage (for more details please see [66][67][68]71] and (v) the number of treatment works required to treat water that comes from surface [41,71,72]. Finally, we included population density which was calculated as a ratio of water population and area [69][70][71][72][73]. Table 1 summarizes the descriptive statistics for the variables employed in the empirical application.…”
Section: Case Study Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its consistent and specific inference on two-stage analysis with DEA estimation in stage 1, bootstrap truncated regression is often utilised to identify relevant variables of efficiency, e.g. for Mozambican banks (Wanke et al 2016), European life insurance companies (Eling and Schaper 2017), water companies in England and Wales (Villegas et al 2019) and hotels in Sri Lanka (Kularatne et al 2019).…”
Section: Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%